[Lldb-commits] [lldb] r105834 - in /lldb/trunk: include/lldb/Symbol/Symtab.h source/Symbol/Symtab.cpp
Greg Clayton
gclayton at apple.com
Wed Jun 16 10:19:02 PDT 2010
Great news. Try testing this same stuff after a "purge" (clear the file caches). The "purge" is not a great test, but it gives you a bit of an idea of how things would perform if nothing was in the file cache...
If things turn out the same as before, feel free to checkin the std::stable_sort fix.
Greg Clayton
On Jun 16, 2010, at 10:04 AM, Owen Anderson wrote:
> OK, I just performed these measurements on 64-bit 10.6, with both -Os and -O3 builds of lldb. In both cases, std::sort was on the order of 50% slower than qsort_r:
>
> -Os -O3
> std::sort 0.118s 0.103s
> qsort_r 0.077s 0.078s
>
> However, here's the interesting part:
>
> std::stable_sort 0.051s 0.048s
>
> So, it looks like the symbol tables are already mostly sorted, and a simple insertion sort is able to "complete" the sort quickly. FWIW, this would also be a good place to apply TimSort or some other heuristic sort.
>
> --Owen
>
>
> On Jun 16, 2010, at 9:27 AM, Greg Clayton wrote:
>
>> We start with "Sketch" from the /Developer/Expamples. It loads 91 shared libraries right off the bat, and if you then type:
>>
>> (lldb) log timers enable
>> (lldb) breakpoint set --name main
>> (lldb) log timers disable
>>
>> All of the symbol tables will be pulled in, and it will dump the timing information.
>>
>> You will first need to add a scoped timer to the top of:
>>
>> Symtab::SortSymbolIndexesByValue()
>>
>> The easiest way is:
>>
>> Timer scoped_timer (__PRETTY_FUNCTION__,__PRETTY_FUNCTION__);
>>
>> Then you should see an entry in the timer dump for Symtab::SortSymbolIndexesByValue when the "log timers disable" is run with a total time.
>>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/lldb-commits/attachments/20100616/9e9cccfe/attachment.html>
More information about the lldb-commits
mailing list