[libcxx-dev] Libcxx testing with top-of-tree clang?

David Zarzycki via libcxx-dev libcxx-dev at lists.llvm.org
Fri Nov 29 23:51:02 PST 2019

> On Nov 29, 2019, at 11:30 PM, Marshall Clow <mclow.lists at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 29, 2019 at 3:50 AM David Zarzycki via libcxx-dev <libcxx-dev at lists.llvm.org <mailto:libcxx-dev at lists.llvm.org>> wrote:
> Do any of the bots test libcxx with top-of-tree clang? More than once I’ve suspected the answer is “no”. Most recently, the test suite has been broken for a few days now. I’ve worked around the problem by adding -Wno-deprecated-copy to the test suite config but somebody needs to decide if that’s the best long term solution.
> My understanding is that (several of) the libcxx test bots get updated to the latest clang on a regular basis, but not on every run.
> So they may lag behind ToT by a week or so at times.


Separably, why is important for the test suite to fail when new warnings are introduced? Is there a way to relax the test suite?
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/libcxx-dev/attachments/20191130/c17258f4/attachment.html>

More information about the libcxx-dev mailing list