[libcxx-commits] [libcxx] [libc++] Remove `optional::iterator` from experimental mode (PR #203782)

[Nikolas Klauser via libcxx-commits]

philnik777 wrote:

> @philnik777 I'm curious to know whether you have another abstraction in mind instead of `capacity_aware_iterator`, or whether you think we should just implement `optional`'s iterator directly without an underlying abstraction?

Not quite sure what you mean by "directly without an underlying abstraction".
I'm simply not convinced that the benefits of having a separate iterator outweigh the costs. I'm happy to talk about this in our next 1:1 if you'd like.

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/203782