[libcxx-commits] [libcxx] [libc++] Trim down associative container benchmark sizes (PR #212252)

[Louis Dionne via libcxx-commits]

ldionne wrote:

@philnik777 When we use `Arg(0)`, it's not clear to me that we're measuring anything meaningful though. Many of these benchmarks contain `PauseTiming` and `ResumeTiming`, and that would trump the measurement of a cheap `n = 0` operation. Don't you think?

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/212252