[libcxx-commits] [libcxx] [libc++][RFC] Rewrite CPOs with resolver functions (PR #209104)

[Louis Dionne via libcxx-commits]

================
@@ -12,15 +12,17 @@
 
----------------
ldionne wrote:

Nitpick: Is "resolver function" a term of art you've seen elsewhere? If not, I'd avoid using it. Resolvers are also a dyld feature to perform dynamic resolution of symbols at load time, and I'd love to avoid overloading the term if possible.

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/209104