[libcxx-commits] [libcxx] [libc++] Implement LWG3133: Modernizing numeric type requirements (PR #208145)

[A. Jiang via libcxx-commits]

================
@@ -136,7 +136,7 @@
 "`LWG3101 <https://wg21.link/LWG3101>`__","``span``\ 's ``Container``\  constructors need another constraint","2019-02 (Kona)","|Complete|","","`#103837 <https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/103837>`__",""
 "`LWG3112 <https://wg21.link/LWG3112>`__","``system_error``\  and ``filesystem_error``\  constructors taking a ``string``\  may not be able to meet their postconditions","2019-02 (Kona)","|Nothing To Do|","","`#100253 <https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/100253>`__",""
 "`LWG3119 <https://wg21.link/LWG3119>`__","Program-definedness of closure types","2019-02 (Kona)","|Nothing To Do|","","`#103838 <https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/103838>`__",""
-"`LWG3133 <https://wg21.link/LWG3133>`__","Modernizing numeric type requirements","2019-02 (Kona)","","","`#100254 <https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/100254>`__",""
+"`LWG3133 <https://wg21.link/LWG3133>`__","Modernizing numeric type requirements","2019-02 (Kona)","|Complete|","23","`#100254 <https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/100254>`__",""
----------------
frederick-vs-ja wrote:

I'm note sure whether we should mark the version as `23`. Maybe it's better to drop the version.

Violation of the named requirements technically results UB/IFNDR, and implementations are not yet required to diagnose the violation. I personally want to diagnose such violation, but not sure whether implementors wan to do so.

CC @ldionne @philnik777.

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/208145