[libcxx-commits] [libcxx] [libc++] Fix use of static in constexpr (PR #175667)

[Daniel Thornburgh via libcxx-commits]

mysterymath wrote:

> I think we had this problem before already, and I'm not a fan of non-NFC patches that aren't tested. We don't care about the warning, so that's not a problem. I'd really like to have a feature request that GCC allows the extension in older language modes. Until we actually have that I'd really like to see a clang-tidy check to make sure we're not regressing on this again.

Isn't this a NFC patch? It doesn't say so on the tin, but it shouldn't create any functional changes the compiled binaries.

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/175667