[libcxx-commits] [libcxx] [libc++] Correct `optional<T&>` implementation (PR #174537)

[William Tran-Viet via libcxx-commits]

smallp-o-p wrote:

Obviously, I wonder if the current approach of having a common base class and not a partial specialization for `optional<T>` and `optional<T&>` is still worth it given the amount of modifications we have to do to the original class.



https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/174537