[libcxx-commits] [libcxx] [libc++] Implement P0493R5: Atomic minimum/maximum (PR #180333)

[Connector Switch via libcxx-commits]

c8ef wrote:

> > > You can try to rebase to trigger the CI again.
> > 
> > 
> > As per https://llvm.org/docs/GitHub.html#rebasing-pull-requests-and-force-pushes, we should avoid unnecessary rebases.
> > Regarding the various style suggestions (like `typedef`, concepts, and docstrings): They may look _odd_ but maintain consistency with existing implementations and test cases. While I'm open to changing them in this patch, I think it would be clearer to address them all in a subsequent NFC patch, since these aren't pressing issues. Either way, I'll wait for the maintainers' input on this.
> 
> Please do. We don't need to make new code less readable just because we did so in the past.

Done.

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/180333