[libcxx-commits] [libcxx] [libc++] Implement P0493R5: Atomic minimum/maximum (PR #180333)

[Nikolas Klauser via libcxx-commits]

philnik777 wrote:

> > You can try to rebase to trigger the CI again.
> 
> As per https://llvm.org/docs/GitHub.html#rebasing-pull-requests-and-force-pushes, we should avoid unnecessary rebases.
> 
> Regarding the various style suggestions (like `typedef`, concepts, and docstrings): They may look _odd_ but maintain consistency with existing implementations and test cases. While I'm open to changing them in this patch, I think it would be clearer to address them all in a subsequent NFC patch, since these aren't pressing issues. Either way, I'll wait for the maintainers' input on this.

Please do. We don't need to make new code less readable just because we did so in the past.

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/180333