[libcxx-commits] [libcxx] [libc++]libcxx constexpr deque (PR #200929)

[A. Jiang via libcxx-commits]

frederick-vs-ja wrote:

> @frederick-vs-ja Do you still consider the above as a viable option? I had a quick look at the tests in this PR and I think I don't like what I see. If that's still the (possible) plan. I'd propose to close this PR and copy over the relevant bits to the original PR: #129368

Yes. I'd like to do so.

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/200929