[libcxx-commits] [libcxx] [libcxx] adds a size-based representation for `vector`'s unstable ABI (PR #155330)

Louis Dionne via libcxx-commits libcxx-commits at lists.llvm.org
Fri Apr 3 09:54:03 PDT 2026


================
@@ -0,0 +1,505 @@
+//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
+//
+// Part of the LLVM Project, under the Apache License v2.0 with LLVM Exceptions.
+// See https://llvm.org/LICENSE.txt for license information.
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: Apache-2.0 WITH LLVM-exception
+//
+//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
+
+#ifndef _LIBCPP___VECTOR_LAYOUT_H
+#define _LIBCPP___VECTOR_LAYOUT_H
+
+#include <__assert>
+#include <__config>
+#include <__debug_utils/sanitizers.h>
+#include <__memory/allocator_traits.h>
+#include <__memory/compressed_pair.h>
+#include <__memory/pointer_traits.h>
+#include <__memory/swap_allocator.h>
+#include <__memory/uninitialized_algorithms.h>
+#include <__split_buffer>
+#include <__type_traits/is_nothrow_constructible.h>
+#include <__utility/move.h>
+#include <__utility/swap.h>
+
+#if !defined(_LIBCPP_HAS_NO_PRAGMA_SYSTEM_HEADER)
+#  pragma GCC system_header
+#endif
+
+_LIBCPP_PUSH_MACROS
+#include <__undef_macros>
+
+_LIBCPP_BEGIN_NAMESPACE_STD
+
+/// Defines `std::vector`'s storage layout and any operations that are affected by a change in the
+/// layout.
+///
+/// Dynamically-sized arrays like `std::vector` have several different representations. libc++
+/// supports two different layouts for `std::vector`:
+///
+///   * pointer-based layout
+///   * size-based layout
+//
+/// We describe these layouts below. All vector representations have a pointer that points to where
+/// the memory is allocated (called `__begin_`).
+///
+/// **Pointer-based layout**
+///
+/// The pointer-based layout uses two more pointers in addition to `__begin_`. The second pointer
+/// (called `__end_`) points past the end of the part of the buffer that holds valid elements.
+/// Another pointer (called `__capacity_`) points past the end of the allocated buffer. This is the
+/// default representation for libc++ due to historical reasons.
+///
+/// The `__end_` pointer has three primary use-cases:
+///   * to compute the size of the vector; and
+///   * to construct the past-the-end iterator; and
+///   * to indicate where the next element should be appended.
+///
+/// The `__capacity_` is used to compute the capacity of the vector, which lets the vector know how
+/// many elements can be added to the vector before a reallocation is necessary.
+///
+///    __begin_ = 0xE4FD0, __end_ = 0xE4FF0, __capacity_ = 0xE5000
+///                 0xE4FD0                             0xE4FF0           0xE5000
+///                    v                                   v                 v
+///    +---------------+--------+--------+--------+--------+--------+--------+---------------------+
+///    | ????????????? |   3174 |   5656 |    648 |    489 | ------ | ------ | ??????????????????? |
+///    +---------------+--------+--------+--------+--------+--------+--------+---------------------+
+///                    ^                                   ^                 ^
+///                __begin_                             __end_          __capacity_
+///
+///    Figure 1: A visual representation of a pointer-based `std::vector<short>`. This vector has
+///    four elements, with the capacity to store six. Boxes with numbers are valid elements within
+///    the vector, and boxes with `xx` have been allocated, but aren't being used as elements right
+///    now.
+///
+/// This is the default layout for libc++.
+///
+/// **Size-based layout**
+///
+/// The size-based layout uses integers to track its size and capacity, and computes pointers to
+/// past-the-end of the valid range and the whole buffer only when it's necessary. Programs using
+/// the size-based layout have been measured to yield improved compute and memory performance over
+/// the pointer-based layout. Despite these promising measurements, the size-based layout is opt-in,
+/// to preserve ABI compatibility with prebuilt binaries. Given the improved performance, we
+/// recommend preferring the size-based layout in the absence of such ABI constraints.
+///
+///    __begin_ = 0xE4FD0, __size_ = 4, __capacity_ = 6
+///                 0xE4FD0
+///                    v
+///    +---------------+--------+--------+--------+--------+--------+--------+---------------------+
+///    | ????????????? |   3174 |   5656 |    648 |    489 | ------ | ------ | ??????????????????? |
+///    +---------------+--------+--------+--------+--------+--------+--------+---------------------+
+///                    ^
+///                __begin_
+///
+///    Figure 2: A visual representation of this a size-based layout. Blank boxes are not a part
+///    of the vector's allocated buffer.
+///
+/// **Class design**
+///
+/// __vector_layout was designed with the following goals:
+///    1. to abstractly represent the buffer's boundaries; and
+///    2. to limit the number of `#ifdef` blocks that a reader needs to pass through; and
+///    3. given (1) and (2), to have no logically identical components in multiple `#ifdef` clauses.
+///
+/// To facilitate these goals, there is a single `__vector_layout` definition. Users must choose
+/// their vector's layout when libc++ is being configured, so there is no need to manage multiple
+/// vector layout types (e.g. `__vector_size_layout`, `__vector_pointer_layout`, etc.). In doing so,
+/// we reduce a significant portion of duplicate code.
+template <class _Tp, class _Allocator>
+class __vector_layout {
+public:
+  using value_type _LIBCPP_NODEBUG     = _Tp;
+  using allocator_type _LIBCPP_NODEBUG = _Allocator;
+  using __alloc_traits _LIBCPP_NODEBUG = allocator_traits<allocator_type>;
+  using size_type _LIBCPP_NODEBUG      = typename __alloc_traits::size_type;
+  using pointer _LIBCPP_NODEBUG        = typename __alloc_traits::pointer;
+  using const_pointer _LIBCPP_NODEBUG  = typename __alloc_traits::const_pointer;
+#ifdef _LIBCPP_ABI_SIZE_BASED_VECTOR
+  using _SplitBuffer _LIBCPP_NODEBUG    = __split_buffer<_Tp, _Allocator, __split_buffer_size_layout>;
+  using __boundary_type _LIBCPP_NODEBUG = size_type;
+#else
+  using _SplitBuffer _LIBCPP_NODEBUG    = __split_buffer<_Tp, _Allocator, __split_buffer_pointer_layout>;
+  using __boundary_type _LIBCPP_NODEBUG = pointer;
+#endif
+
+  // Cannot be defaulted, since `_LIBCPP_COMPRESSED_PAIR` isn't an aggregate before C++14.
+  _LIBCPP_CONSTEXPR_SINCE_CXX20 _LIBCPP_HIDE_FROM_ABI __vector_layout()
+      _NOEXCEPT_(is_nothrow_default_constructible<allocator_type>::value)
+      : __capacity_(__zero_boundary_type()) {}
+
+  _LIBCPP_CONSTEXPR_SINCE_CXX20 _LIBCPP_HIDE_FROM_ABI explicit __vector_layout(allocator_type const& __a)
+      _NOEXCEPT_(is_nothrow_copy_constructible<allocator_type>::value)
+      : __capacity_(__zero_boundary_type()), __alloc_(__a) {}
+
+  _LIBCPP_CONSTEXPR_SINCE_CXX20 _LIBCPP_HIDE_FROM_ABI explicit __vector_layout(allocator_type&& __a)
+      _NOEXCEPT_(is_nothrow_move_constructible<allocator_type>::value)
+      : __capacity_(__zero_boundary_type()), __alloc_(std::move(__a)) {}
+
+  _LIBCPP_CONSTEXPR_SINCE_CXX20 _LIBCPP_HIDE_FROM_ABI __vector_layout(__vector_layout&& __other)
+      _NOEXCEPT_(is_nothrow_move_constructible<allocator_type>::value)
+      : __begin_(std::move(__other.__begin_)),
+        __boundary_(std::move(__other.__boundary_)),
+        __capacity_(std::move(__other.__capacity_)),
+        __alloc_(std::move(__other.__alloc_)) {
+    __other.__begin_    = nullptr;
+    __other.__boundary_ = __zero_boundary_type();
+    __other.__capacity_ = __zero_boundary_type();
+  }
+
+  /// Returns a reference to the stored allocator.
+  [[__nodiscard__]] _LIBCPP_CONSTEXPR_SINCE_CXX20 _LIBCPP_HIDE_FROM_ABI allocator_type& __alloc() _NOEXCEPT {
+    return __alloc_;
+  }
+
+  [[__nodiscard__]] _LIBCPP_CONSTEXPR_SINCE_CXX20 _LIBCPP_HIDE_FROM_ABI allocator_type const&
+  __alloc() const _NOEXCEPT {
+    return __alloc_;
+  }
+
+  /// Returns a pointer to the beginning of the buffer.
+  ///
+  /// `__begin_ptr()` is not called `data()` because `vector::data()` returns `T*`, but `__begin_`
+  /// is allowed to be a fancy pointer.
+  [[__nodiscard__]] _LIBCPP_CONSTEXPR_SINCE_CXX20 _LIBCPP_HIDE_FROM_ABI pointer __begin_ptr() _NOEXCEPT {
+    return __begin_;
+  }
+
+  [[__nodiscard__]] _LIBCPP_CONSTEXPR_SINCE_CXX20 _LIBCPP_HIDE_FROM_ABI const_pointer __begin_ptr() const _NOEXCEPT {
+    return __begin_;
+  }
+
+  /// Returns a built-in pointer to the beginning of the buffer.
+  [[__nodiscard__]] _LIBCPP_CONSTEXPR_SINCE_CXX20 _LIBCPP_HIDE_FROM_ABI _Tp* __data() _NOEXCEPT {
+    return std::__to_address(__begin_);
+  }
+
+  [[__nodiscard__]] _LIBCPP_CONSTEXPR_SINCE_CXX20 _LIBCPP_HIDE_FROM_ABI _Tp const* __data() const _NOEXCEPT {
+    return std::__to_address(__begin_);
+  }
+
+  /// Returns the value that the layout uses to determine the vector's size.
+  ///
+  /// `__boundary_representation()` should only be used when directly operating on the layout from
+  /// outside `__vector_layout`. Its result must be used with type deduction to avoid compile-time
+  /// failures.
+  [[__nodiscard__]] _LIBCPP_CONSTEXPR_SINCE_CXX20 _LIBCPP_HIDE_FROM_ABI __boundary_type
+  __boundary_representation() const _NOEXCEPT {
+    return __boundary_;
+  }
+
+  /// Returns the value that the layout uses to determine the vector's capacity.
+  ///
+  /// `__capacity_representation()` should only be used when directly operating on the layout from
+  /// outside `__vector_layout`. Its result must be used with type deduction to avoid compile-time
+  /// failures.
+  [[__nodiscard__]] _LIBCPP_CONSTEXPR_SINCE_CXX20 _LIBCPP_HIDE_FROM_ABI __boundary_type
+  __capacity_representation() const _NOEXCEPT {
+    return __capacity_;
+  }
+
+  /// Returns how many elements can be added before a reallocation occurs.
+  [[__nodiscard__]] _LIBCPP_CONSTEXPR_SINCE_CXX20 _LIBCPP_HIDE_FROM_ABI size_type
+  __remaining_capacity() const _NOEXCEPT {
+    return __capacity_ - __boundary_;
+  }
+
+  /// Determines if a reallocation is necessary.
+  [[__nodiscard__]] _LIBCPP_CONSTEXPR_SINCE_CXX20 _LIBCPP_HIDE_FROM_ABI bool __is_full() const _NOEXCEPT {
+    return __boundary_ == __capacity_;
+  }
+
+  _LIBCPP_CONSTEXPR_SINCE_CXX20 _LIBCPP_HIDE_FROM_ABI void
+  __set_layout(pointer __new_begin, size_type __new_size, size_type __new_capacity) _NOEXCEPT {
+    __begin_ = __new_begin;
+    __set_boundary(__new_size);
+    __set_capacity(__new_capacity);
+  }
+
+  _LIBCPP_CONSTEXPR_SINCE_CXX20 _LIBCPP_HIDE_FROM_ABI void __reset_without_allocator() _NOEXCEPT {
+    __begin_ = nullptr;
+    __set_boundary(__zero_relative_to_begin());
+    __set_capacity(__zero_relative_to_begin());
+  }
+
+  _LIBCPP_CONSTEXPR_SINCE_CXX20 _LIBCPP_HIDE_FROM_ABI void swap(__vector_layout& __other) _NOEXCEPT {
+    std::swap(__begin_, __other.__begin_);
+    std::swap(__boundary_, __other.__boundary_);
+    std::swap(__capacity_, __other.__capacity_);
+    std::__swap_allocator(__alloc_, __other.__alloc_);
+  }
+
+  _LIBCPP_CONSTEXPR_SINCE_CXX20 _LIBCPP_HIDE_FROM_ABI void __swap_layouts(_SplitBuffer& __other) _NOEXCEPT {
+    __other.__swap_layouts(__begin_, __boundary_, __capacity_);
+  }
+
+  _LIBCPP_CONSTEXPR_SINCE_CXX20 _LIBCPP_HIDE_FROM_ABI void
+  __move_without_allocator(__vector_layout& __other) _NOEXCEPT {
+    __begin_    = __other.__begin_;
+    __boundary_ = __other.__boundary_;
+    __capacity_ = __other.__capacity_;
+
+    __other.__reset_without_allocator();
+  }
+
+  _LIBCPP_CONSTEXPR_SINCE_CXX20 _LIBCPP_HIDE_FROM_ABI void __relocate(_SplitBuffer& __buffer) {
+    __annotate_delete();
+    __buffer.__relocate(__begin_, __boundary_, __capacity_);
+    __annotate_new(__size());
+  }
+
+  _LIBCPP_CONSTEXPR_SINCE_CXX20 _LIBCPP_HIDE_FROM_ABI pointer
+  __relocate_with_pivot(_SplitBuffer& __buffer, pointer __pivot) {
+    __annotate_delete();
+    auto __result = __buffer.__relocate_with_pivot(__pivot, __begin_, __boundary_, __capacity_);
+    __annotate_new(__size());
+    return __result;
+  }
+
+  // Methods below this line must be implemented per vector layout.
+  [[__nodiscard__]] _LIBCPP_CONSTEXPR_SINCE_CXX20 _LIBCPP_HIDE_FROM_ABI size_type __size() const _NOEXCEPT;
+  [[__nodiscard__]] _LIBCPP_CONSTEXPR_SINCE_CXX20 _LIBCPP_HIDE_FROM_ABI size_type __capacity() const _NOEXCEPT;
+  [[__nodiscard__]] _LIBCPP_CONSTEXPR_SINCE_CXX20 _LIBCPP_HIDE_FROM_ABI bool __empty() const _NOEXCEPT;
+  [[__nodiscard__]] _LIBCPP_CONSTEXPR_SINCE_CXX20 _LIBCPP_HIDE_FROM_ABI _Tp& __back() _NOEXCEPT;
+  [[__nodiscard__]] _LIBCPP_CONSTEXPR_SINCE_CXX20 _LIBCPP_HIDE_FROM_ABI _Tp const& __back() const _NOEXCEPT;
+  [[__nodiscard__]] _LIBCPP_CONSTEXPR_SINCE_CXX20 _LIBCPP_HIDE_FROM_ABI pointer __end_ptr() _NOEXCEPT;
+  [[__nodiscard__]] _LIBCPP_CONSTEXPR_SINCE_CXX20 _LIBCPP_HIDE_FROM_ABI const_pointer __end_ptr() const _NOEXCEPT;
+  [[__nodiscard__]] _LIBCPP_CONSTEXPR_SINCE_CXX20 _LIBCPP_HIDE_FROM_ABI pointer __capacity_ptr() _NOEXCEPT;
+  [[__nodiscard__]] _LIBCPP_CONSTEXPR_SINCE_CXX20 _LIBCPP_HIDE_FROM_ABI const_pointer __capacity_ptr() const _NOEXCEPT;
+  [[__nodiscard__]] _LIBCPP_CONSTEXPR_SINCE_CXX20 _LIBCPP_HIDE_FROM_ABI bool __invariants() const _NOEXCEPT;
+  _LIBCPP_CONSTEXPR_SINCE_CXX20 _LIBCPP_HIDE_FROM_ABI void __set_boundary(size_type __n) _NOEXCEPT;
+  _LIBCPP_CONSTEXPR_SINCE_CXX20 _LIBCPP_HIDE_FROM_ABI void __set_boundary(pointer __ptr) _NOEXCEPT;
+  _LIBCPP_CONSTEXPR_SINCE_CXX20 _LIBCPP_HIDE_FROM_ABI void __set_capacity(size_type __n) _NOEXCEPT;
+  _LIBCPP_CONSTEXPR_SINCE_CXX20 _LIBCPP_HIDE_FROM_ABI void __set_capacity(pointer __ptr) _NOEXCEPT;
+
+  /// Returns `__begin_` if `__boundary_type` is `pointer`, and `0` if it is `size_type`.
+  ///
+  /// Since `0` is implicitly convertible to both `size_type` and `nullptr`, `__set_boundary(0)` is
+  /// ambiguous. Using a named function optimises for the reader much more nicely than using an
+  /// explicit cast to `size_type`. In addition to describing intent, this function avoids extra
+  /// pointer arithmetic in the pointer-based `__set_boundary(size_type{})`.
+  ///
+  /// Note that this function cannot be used when setting `__begin_`.
+  [[__nodiscard__]] _LIBCPP_CONSTEXPR_SINCE_CXX20 _LIBCPP_HIDE_FROM_ABI __boundary_type
+  __zero_relative_to_begin() _NOEXCEPT;
+  // Works around a Clang 20 zero-initialization bug on user-defined pointer types.
+  [[__nodiscard__]] _LIBCPP_CONSTEXPR_SINCE_CXX20 _LIBCPP_HIDE_FROM_ABI static __boundary_type
+  __zero_boundary_type() _NOEXCEPT;
+
+private:
+  pointer __begin_ = nullptr;
+
+#ifdef _LIBCPP_ABI_SIZE_BASED_VECTOR
+  size_type __boundary_ = 0;
+  size_type __capacity_ = 0;
+  [[no_unique_address]] allocator_type __alloc_;
+#else
+  pointer __boundary_ = nullptr;
+  _LIBCPP_COMPRESSED_PAIR(pointer, __capacity_, allocator_type, __alloc_);
+#endif
+
+  _LIBCPP_CONSTEXPR_SINCE_CXX20
+  _LIBCPP_HIDE_FROM_ABI void __annotate_contiguous_container(const void* __old_mid, const void* __new_mid) const {
+    std::__annotate_contiguous_container<_Allocator>(__data(), __data() + __capacity(), __old_mid, __new_mid);
+  }
+
+  _LIBCPP_CONSTEXPR_SINCE_CXX20 _LIBCPP_HIDE_FROM_ABI void __annotate_new(size_type __current_size) const _NOEXCEPT {
+    __annotate_contiguous_container(__data() + __capacity(), __data() + __current_size);
+  }
+
+  _LIBCPP_CONSTEXPR_SINCE_CXX20 _LIBCPP_HIDE_FROM_ABI void __annotate_delete() const _NOEXCEPT {
+    __annotate_contiguous_container(__data() + __size(), __data() + __capacity());
+  }
+};
+
+#ifdef _LIBCPP_ABI_SIZE_BASED_VECTOR
+template <class _Tp, class _Alloc>
+_LIBCPP_CONSTEXPR_SINCE_CXX20
+typename __vector_layout<_Tp, _Alloc>::size_type __vector_layout<_Tp, _Alloc>::__size() const _NOEXCEPT {
+  return __boundary_;
+}
+
+template <class _Tp, class _Alloc>
+_LIBCPP_CONSTEXPR_SINCE_CXX20 typename __vector_layout<_Tp, _Alloc>::size_type
+__vector_layout<_Tp, _Alloc>::__capacity() const _NOEXCEPT {
+  return __capacity_;
+}
+
+template <class _Tp, class _Alloc>
+_LIBCPP_CONSTEXPR_SINCE_CXX20 bool __vector_layout<_Tp, _Alloc>::__empty() const _NOEXCEPT {
+  return __boundary_ == 0;
+}
+
+template <class _Tp, class _Alloc>
+_LIBCPP_CONSTEXPR_SINCE_CXX20 _Tp& __vector_layout<_Tp, _Alloc>::__back() _NOEXCEPT {
+  return __begin_[__boundary_ - 1];
+}
+
+template <class _Tp, class _Alloc>
+_LIBCPP_CONSTEXPR_SINCE_CXX20 _Tp const& __vector_layout<_Tp, _Alloc>::__back() const _NOEXCEPT {
+  return __begin_[__boundary_ - 1];
+}
+
+template <class _Tp, class _Alloc>
+_LIBCPP_CONSTEXPR_SINCE_CXX20 typename __vector_layout<_Tp, _Alloc>::pointer
+__vector_layout<_Tp, _Alloc>::__end_ptr() _NOEXCEPT {
+  return __begin_ + __boundary_;
+}
+
+template <class _Tp, class _Alloc>
+_LIBCPP_CONSTEXPR_SINCE_CXX20 typename __vector_layout<_Tp, _Alloc>::const_pointer
+__vector_layout<_Tp, _Alloc>::__end_ptr() const _NOEXCEPT {
+  return __begin_ + __boundary_;
+}
+
+template <class _Tp, class _Alloc>
+_LIBCPP_CONSTEXPR_SINCE_CXX20 typename __vector_layout<_Tp, _Alloc>::pointer
+__vector_layout<_Tp, _Alloc>::__capacity_ptr() _NOEXCEPT {
+  return __begin_ + __capacity_;
+}
+
+template <class _Tp, class _Alloc>
+_LIBCPP_CONSTEXPR_SINCE_CXX20 typename __vector_layout<_Tp, _Alloc>::const_pointer
+__vector_layout<_Tp, _Alloc>::__capacity_ptr() const _NOEXCEPT {
+  return __begin_ + __capacity_;
+}
+
+template <class _Tp, class _Alloc>
+_LIBCPP_CONSTEXPR_SINCE_CXX20 bool __vector_layout<_Tp, _Alloc>::__invariants() const _NOEXCEPT {
+  if (__begin_ == nullptr)
+    return __boundary_ == 0 && __capacity_ == 0;
+  return !(__boundary_ > __capacity_);
+}
+
+template <class _Tp, class _Alloc>
+_LIBCPP_CONSTEXPR_SINCE_CXX20 void __vector_layout<_Tp, _Alloc>::__set_boundary(size_type __n) _NOEXCEPT {
+  __boundary_ = __n;
+}
+
+template <class _Tp, class _Alloc>
+_LIBCPP_CONSTEXPR_SINCE_CXX20 void __vector_layout<_Tp, _Alloc>::__set_boundary(pointer __ptr) _NOEXCEPT {
+  __boundary_ = static_cast<size_type>(__ptr - __begin_);
+}
+
+template <class _Tp, class _Alloc>
+_LIBCPP_CONSTEXPR_SINCE_CXX20 void __vector_layout<_Tp, _Alloc>::__set_capacity(size_type __n) _NOEXCEPT {
+  __capacity_ = __n;
+}
+
+template <class _Tp, class _Alloc>
+_LIBCPP_CONSTEXPR_SINCE_CXX20 void __vector_layout<_Tp, _Alloc>::__set_capacity(pointer __ptr) _NOEXCEPT {
+  __capacity_ = static_cast<size_type>(__ptr - __begin_);
+}
+
+template <class _Tp, class _Alloc>
+_LIBCPP_CONSTEXPR_SINCE_CXX20 typename __vector_layout<_Tp, _Alloc>::__boundary_type
+__vector_layout<_Tp, _Alloc>::__zero_relative_to_begin() _NOEXCEPT {
+  return 0;
+}
+
+template <class _Tp, class _Alloc>
+_LIBCPP_CONSTEXPR_SINCE_CXX20 _LIBCPP_HIDE_FROM_ABI typename __vector_layout<_Tp, _Alloc>::__boundary_type
+__vector_layout<_Tp, _Alloc>::__zero_boundary_type() _NOEXCEPT {
+  return 0;
+}
+#else
+template <class _Tp, class _Alloc>
+_LIBCPP_CONSTEXPR_SINCE_CXX20
+typename __vector_layout<_Tp, _Alloc>::size_type __vector_layout<_Tp, _Alloc>::__size() const _NOEXCEPT {
+  return static_cast<size_type>(__boundary_ - __begin_);
+}
+
+template <class _Tp, class _Alloc>
+_LIBCPP_CONSTEXPR_SINCE_CXX20 typename __vector_layout<_Tp, _Alloc>::size_type
+__vector_layout<_Tp, _Alloc>::__capacity() const _NOEXCEPT {
+  return static_cast<size_type>(__capacity_ - __begin_);
+}
+
+template <class _Tp, class _Alloc>
+_LIBCPP_CONSTEXPR_SINCE_CXX20 bool __vector_layout<_Tp, _Alloc>::__empty() const _NOEXCEPT {
+  return __begin_ == __boundary_;
+}
+
+template <class _Tp, class _Alloc>
+_LIBCPP_CONSTEXPR_SINCE_CXX20 _Tp& __vector_layout<_Tp, _Alloc>::__back() _NOEXCEPT {
+  return __boundary_[-1];
+}
+
+template <class _Tp, class _Alloc>
+_LIBCPP_CONSTEXPR_SINCE_CXX20 _Tp const& __vector_layout<_Tp, _Alloc>::__back() const _NOEXCEPT {
+  return __boundary_[-1];
+}
+
+template <class _Tp, class _Alloc>
+_LIBCPP_CONSTEXPR_SINCE_CXX20 typename __vector_layout<_Tp, _Alloc>::pointer
+__vector_layout<_Tp, _Alloc>::__end_ptr() _NOEXCEPT {
+  return __boundary_;
+}
+
+template <class _Tp, class _Alloc>
+_LIBCPP_CONSTEXPR_SINCE_CXX20 typename __vector_layout<_Tp, _Alloc>::const_pointer
+__vector_layout<_Tp, _Alloc>::__end_ptr() const _NOEXCEPT {
+  return __boundary_;
+}
+
+template <class _Tp, class _Alloc>
+_LIBCPP_CONSTEXPR_SINCE_CXX20 typename __vector_layout<_Tp, _Alloc>::pointer
+__vector_layout<_Tp, _Alloc>::__capacity_ptr() _NOEXCEPT {
+  return __capacity_;
+}
+
+template <class _Tp, class _Alloc>
+_LIBCPP_CONSTEXPR_SINCE_CXX20 typename __vector_layout<_Tp, _Alloc>::const_pointer
+__vector_layout<_Tp, _Alloc>::__capacity_ptr() const _NOEXCEPT {
+  return __capacity_;
+}
+
+template <class _Tp, class _Alloc>
+_LIBCPP_CONSTEXPR_SINCE_CXX20 bool __vector_layout<_Tp, _Alloc>::__invariants() const _NOEXCEPT {
+  if (__begin_ == nullptr)
+    return __boundary_ == 0 && __capacity_ == 0;
+  if (__begin_ > __boundary_)
+    return false;
+  if (__begin_ == __capacity_)
+    return false;
+  return !(__boundary_ > __capacity_);
+}
+
+template <class _Tp, class _Alloc>
+_LIBCPP_CONSTEXPR_SINCE_CXX20 void __vector_layout<_Tp, _Alloc>::__set_boundary(size_type __n) _NOEXCEPT {
+  __boundary_ = __begin_ + __n;
+}
+
+template <class _Tp, class _Alloc>
+_LIBCPP_CONSTEXPR_SINCE_CXX20 void __vector_layout<_Tp, _Alloc>::__set_boundary(pointer __ptr) _NOEXCEPT {
+  __boundary_ = __ptr;
+}
+
+template <class _Tp, class _Alloc>
+_LIBCPP_CONSTEXPR_SINCE_CXX20 void __vector_layout<_Tp, _Alloc>::__set_capacity(size_type __n) _NOEXCEPT {
+  __capacity_ = __begin_ + __n;
+}
+
+template <class _Tp, class _Alloc>
+_LIBCPP_CONSTEXPR_SINCE_CXX20 void __vector_layout<_Tp, _Alloc>::__set_capacity(pointer __ptr) _NOEXCEPT {
+  __capacity_ = __ptr;
+}
+
+template <class _Tp, class _Alloc>
+_LIBCPP_CONSTEXPR_SINCE_CXX20 typename __vector_layout<_Tp, _Alloc>::__boundary_type
+__vector_layout<_Tp, _Alloc>::__zero_relative_to_begin() _NOEXCEPT {
+  return __begin_;
+}
+
+template <class _Tp, class _Alloc>
+_LIBCPP_CONSTEXPR_SINCE_CXX20 _LIBCPP_HIDE_FROM_ABI typename __vector_layout<_Tp, _Alloc>::__boundary_type
+__vector_layout<_Tp, _Alloc>::__zero_boundary_type() _NOEXCEPT {
----------------
ldionne wrote:

I'm not certain if we already discussed this, but why do we need this method instead of just using `__boundary_type()`? It should work for both representation no?

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/155330


More information about the libcxx-commits mailing list