[libcxx-commits] [libcxx] [libc++] Refactor memory allocation in basic_string (PR #128423)

[Aiden Grossman via libcxx-commits]

boomanaiden154 wrote:

Looks like both of these ended up being false positives. The addition of `__rep_.__s = __short()` in `~basic_string` caught some real races under TSan where the destructor was called, but the object wasn't fully freed. Sorry for the noise on that one.

>From what I can gather in the bug tracker, the Fuchsia issue ended up being a build system issue (non ASan instrumented libcxx symbols were getting pulled in).

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/128423