[libcxx-commits] [libcxx] [libc++] Stabilize transitive includes for C++23 (PR #134143)

[Louis Dionne via libcxx-commits]

ldionne wrote:

> I think the rationale makes sense, but I'm not actually sure the solution is the right one. Would keeping the public headers actually help with the breakages you've seen?

I think it would, as with all the other transitive includes breakages? You seem to imply that we'd want another solution, but I'm not certain I follow your thought here. Can you elaborate?

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/134143