[libcxx-commits] [libcxx] [llvm] [libc++] Upgrade to GCC 15 (PR #138293)
Nikolas Klauser via libcxx-commits
libcxx-commits at lists.llvm.org
Tue May 6 01:53:57 PDT 2025
https://github.com/philnik777 updated https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/138293
>From 4317f2e9faf854041c038f09753e0ae90e50035d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Nikolas Klauser <nikolasklauser at berlin.de>
Date: Fri, 2 May 2025 17:24:13 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] [libc++] Upgrade to GCC 15
---
.github/workflows/libcxx-build-and-test.yaml | 8 ++++----
libcxx/docs/index.rst | 2 +-
.../include/__type_traits/add_lvalue_reference.h | 2 +-
libcxx/include/__type_traits/add_pointer.h | 3 ++-
.../include/__type_traits/add_rvalue_reference.h | 2 +-
libcxx/include/__type_traits/decay.h | 2 +-
libcxx/include/__type_traits/remove_all_extents.h | 2 +-
libcxx/include/__type_traits/remove_extent.h | 2 +-
.../alg.contains/ranges.contains.pass.cpp | 4 ++--
.../equality_comparable.compile.pass.cpp | 6 ++++++
.../equality_comparable_with.compile.pass.cpp | 15 +++++++++++++++
.../totally_ordered.compile.pass.cpp | 3 +++
.../totally_ordered_with.compile.pass.cpp | 10 ++++++++++
.../new.delete.array/new.size.except.pass.cpp | 3 +++
.../new.delete/new.delete.array/new.size.pass.cpp | 3 +++
.../new.size_align.except.pass.cpp | 3 +++
.../new.delete.array/new.size_align.pass.cpp | 3 +++
.../new.delete.single/new.size.except.pass.cpp | 3 +++
.../new.delete.single/new.size.pass.cpp | 3 +++
.../new.size_align.except.pass.cpp | 3 +++
.../new.delete.single/new.size_align.pass.cpp | 3 +++
.../rand.dist.samp.discrete/ctor_func.pass.cpp | 3 +++
.../param_ctor_func.pass.cpp | 3 +++
.../range.lazy.split/general.pass.cpp | 12 ++++++++++++
.../expected.expected/monadic/transform.pass.cpp | 4 ++--
.../monadic/transform_error.pass.cpp | 4 ++--
.../monadic/transform_error.pass.cpp | 4 ++--
.../formatter.char_array.pass.cpp | 2 +-
.../meta/meta.rel/is_virtual_base_of.pass.cpp | 7 +++++++
...le.pass.cpp => dependent_return_type.pass.cpp} | 3 +++
.../meta.unary.prop/is_implicit_lifetime.pass.cpp | 2 +-
.../make_optional_explicit.pass.cpp | 3 +++
...ke_optional_explicit_initializer_list.pass.cpp | 3 +++
.../tuple.tuple/tuple.cnstr/PR31384.pass.cpp | 2 +-
34 files changed, 115 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)
rename libcxx/test/std/utilities/meta/meta.unary/{dependent_return_type.compile.pass.cpp => dependent_return_type.pass.cpp} (96%)
diff --git a/.github/workflows/libcxx-build-and-test.yaml b/.github/workflows/libcxx-build-and-test.yaml
index 3551fc150e59b..8ab21634cd8b8 100644
--- a/.github/workflows/libcxx-build-and-test.yaml
+++ b/.github/workflows/libcxx-build-and-test.yaml
@@ -52,8 +52,8 @@ jobs:
cxx: [ 'clang++-21' ]
include:
- config: 'generic-gcc'
- cc: 'gcc-14'
- cxx: 'g++-14'
+ cc: 'gcc-15'
+ cxx: 'g++-15'
steps:
- uses: actions/checkout at 11bd71901bbe5b1630ceea73d27597364c9af683 # v4.2.2
- name: ${{ matrix.config }}.${{ matrix.cxx }}
@@ -92,8 +92,8 @@ jobs:
cxx: [ 'clang++-21' ]
include:
- config: 'generic-gcc-cxx11'
- cc: 'gcc-14'
- cxx: 'g++-14'
+ cc: 'gcc-15'
+ cxx: 'g++-15'
- config: 'generic-cxx26'
cc: 'clang-20'
cxx: 'clang++-20'
diff --git a/libcxx/docs/index.rst b/libcxx/docs/index.rst
index a8b0d5ce1ee97..44737b379f189 100644
--- a/libcxx/docs/index.rst
+++ b/libcxx/docs/index.rst
@@ -134,7 +134,7 @@ Compiler Versions Restrictions Support policy
Clang 19, 20, 21-git latest two stable releases per `LLVM's release page <https://releases.llvm.org>`_ and the development version
AppleClang 15 latest stable release per `Xcode's release page <https://developer.apple.com/documentation/xcode-release-notes>`_
Open XL 17.1.3 (AIX) latest stable release per `Open XL's documentation page <https://www.ibm.com/docs/en/openxl-c-and-cpp-aix>`_
-GCC 14 In C++11 or later only latest stable release per `GCC's release page <https://gcc.gnu.org/releases.html>`_
+GCC 15 In C++11 or later only latest stable release per `GCC's release page <https://gcc.gnu.org/releases.html>`_
============ =================== ========================== =====================
Libc++ also supports common platforms and architectures:
diff --git a/libcxx/include/__type_traits/add_lvalue_reference.h b/libcxx/include/__type_traits/add_lvalue_reference.h
index 5e65477058e5f..42f91623f980c 100644
--- a/libcxx/include/__type_traits/add_lvalue_reference.h
+++ b/libcxx/include/__type_traits/add_lvalue_reference.h
@@ -18,7 +18,7 @@
_LIBCPP_BEGIN_NAMESPACE_STD
-#if __has_builtin(__add_lvalue_reference)
+#if __has_builtin(__add_lvalue_reference) && !defined(_LIBCPP_COMPILER_GCC)
template <class _Tp>
using __add_lvalue_reference_t _LIBCPP_NODEBUG = __add_lvalue_reference(_Tp);
diff --git a/libcxx/include/__type_traits/add_pointer.h b/libcxx/include/__type_traits/add_pointer.h
index a9a51b86abaf0..289d51adc4fb0 100644
--- a/libcxx/include/__type_traits/add_pointer.h
+++ b/libcxx/include/__type_traits/add_pointer.h
@@ -20,7 +20,8 @@
_LIBCPP_BEGIN_NAMESPACE_STD
-#if !defined(_LIBCPP_WORKAROUND_OBJCXX_COMPILER_INTRINSICS) && __has_builtin(__add_pointer)
+#if !defined(_LIBCPP_WORKAROUND_OBJCXX_COMPILER_INTRINSICS) && __has_builtin(__add_pointer) && \
+ !defined(_LIBCPP_COMPILER_GCC)
template <class _Tp>
using __add_pointer_t _LIBCPP_NODEBUG = __add_pointer(_Tp);
diff --git a/libcxx/include/__type_traits/add_rvalue_reference.h b/libcxx/include/__type_traits/add_rvalue_reference.h
index c51dd54a76789..33cc00180cc13 100644
--- a/libcxx/include/__type_traits/add_rvalue_reference.h
+++ b/libcxx/include/__type_traits/add_rvalue_reference.h
@@ -18,7 +18,7 @@
_LIBCPP_BEGIN_NAMESPACE_STD
-#if __has_builtin(__add_rvalue_reference)
+#if __has_builtin(__add_rvalue_reference) && !defined(_LIBCPP_COMPILER_GCC)
template <class _Tp>
using __add_rvalue_reference_t _LIBCPP_NODEBUG = __add_rvalue_reference(_Tp);
diff --git a/libcxx/include/__type_traits/decay.h b/libcxx/include/__type_traits/decay.h
index 2e3d05d1e4871..1e663fdcd0eda 100644
--- a/libcxx/include/__type_traits/decay.h
+++ b/libcxx/include/__type_traits/decay.h
@@ -25,7 +25,7 @@
_LIBCPP_BEGIN_NAMESPACE_STD
-#if __has_builtin(__decay)
+#if __has_builtin(__decay) && !defined(_LIBCPP_COMPILER_GCC)
template <class _Tp>
using __decay_t _LIBCPP_NODEBUG = __decay(_Tp);
diff --git a/libcxx/include/__type_traits/remove_all_extents.h b/libcxx/include/__type_traits/remove_all_extents.h
index bd7e8060f1a55..2c7aea2bfd182 100644
--- a/libcxx/include/__type_traits/remove_all_extents.h
+++ b/libcxx/include/__type_traits/remove_all_extents.h
@@ -18,7 +18,7 @@
_LIBCPP_BEGIN_NAMESPACE_STD
-#if __has_builtin(__remove_all_extents)
+#if __has_builtin(__remove_all_extents) && !defined(_LIBCPP_COMPILER_GCC)
template <class _Tp>
struct _LIBCPP_NO_SPECIALIZATIONS remove_all_extents {
using type _LIBCPP_NODEBUG = __remove_all_extents(_Tp);
diff --git a/libcxx/include/__type_traits/remove_extent.h b/libcxx/include/__type_traits/remove_extent.h
index 75bb70015b79c..7745af14bdb17 100644
--- a/libcxx/include/__type_traits/remove_extent.h
+++ b/libcxx/include/__type_traits/remove_extent.h
@@ -18,7 +18,7 @@
_LIBCPP_BEGIN_NAMESPACE_STD
-#if __has_builtin(__remove_extent)
+#if __has_builtin(__remove_extent) && !defined(_LIBCPP_COMPILER_GCC)
template <class _Tp>
struct _LIBCPP_NO_SPECIALIZATIONS remove_extent {
using type _LIBCPP_NODEBUG = __remove_extent(_Tp);
diff --git a/libcxx/test/std/algorithms/alg.nonmodifying/alg.contains/ranges.contains.pass.cpp b/libcxx/test/std/algorithms/alg.nonmodifying/alg.contains/ranges.contains.pass.cpp
index 08d8e119a4d24..1e89cd272e643 100644
--- a/libcxx/test/std/algorithms/alg.nonmodifying/alg.contains/ranges.contains.pass.cpp
+++ b/libcxx/test/std/algorithms/alg.nonmodifying/alg.contains/ranges.contains.pass.cpp
@@ -195,7 +195,7 @@ constexpr bool test() {
std::string a[] = {str1, str1, str, str1, str1};
auto whole =
std::ranges::subrange(forward_iterator(std::move_iterator(a)), forward_iterator(std::move_iterator(a + 5)));
- bool ret = std::ranges::contains(whole.begin(), whole.end(), "hello world", [&](const std::string i) {
+ bool ret = std::ranges::contains(whole.begin(), whole.end(), +"hello world", [&](const std::string i) {
++projection_count;
return i;
});
@@ -207,7 +207,7 @@ constexpr bool test() {
std::string a[] = {str1, str1, str, str1, str1};
auto whole =
std::ranges::subrange(forward_iterator(std::move_iterator(a)), forward_iterator(std::move_iterator(a + 5)));
- bool ret = std::ranges::contains(whole, "hello world", [&](const std::string i) {
+ bool ret = std::ranges::contains(whole, +"hello world", [&](const std::string i) {
++projection_count;
return i;
});
diff --git a/libcxx/test/std/concepts/concepts.compare/concept.equalitycomparable/equality_comparable.compile.pass.cpp b/libcxx/test/std/concepts/concepts.compare/concept.equalitycomparable/equality_comparable.compile.pass.cpp
index ca0f40eb77d49..0531c0e096a13 100644
--- a/libcxx/test/std/concepts/concepts.compare/concept.equalitycomparable/equality_comparable.compile.pass.cpp
+++ b/libcxx/test/std/concepts/concepts.compare/concept.equalitycomparable/equality_comparable.compile.pass.cpp
@@ -26,6 +26,7 @@
#include <vector>
#include "compare_types.h"
+#include "test_macros.h"
namespace fundamentals {
static_assert(std::equality_comparable<int>);
@@ -43,7 +44,12 @@ static_assert(std::equality_comparable<unsigned char&&>);
static_assert(std::equality_comparable<unsigned short const&&>);
static_assert(std::equality_comparable<unsigned int volatile&&>);
static_assert(std::equality_comparable<unsigned long const volatile&&>);
+// Array comparisons are ill-formed in C++26, but Clang doesn't implement this yet.
+#if TEST_STD_VER <= 23 || defined(TEST_COMPILER_CLANG)
static_assert(std::equality_comparable<int[5]>);
+#else
+static_assert(!std::equality_comparable<int[5]>);
+#endif
static_assert(std::equality_comparable<int (*)(int)>);
static_assert(std::equality_comparable<int (&)(int)>);
static_assert(std::equality_comparable<int (*)(int) noexcept>);
diff --git a/libcxx/test/std/concepts/concepts.compare/concept.equalitycomparable/equality_comparable_with.compile.pass.cpp b/libcxx/test/std/concepts/concepts.compare/concept.equalitycomparable/equality_comparable_with.compile.pass.cpp
index 0afbe582ba896..2f8d7862c0f4d 100644
--- a/libcxx/test/std/concepts/concepts.compare/concept.equalitycomparable/equality_comparable_with.compile.pass.cpp
+++ b/libcxx/test/std/concepts/concepts.compare/concept.equalitycomparable/equality_comparable_with.compile.pass.cpp
@@ -107,7 +107,12 @@ static_assert(!check_equality_comparable_with < int,
int (S::*)() const volatile&& noexcept > ());
static_assert(check_equality_comparable_with<int*, int*>());
+// Array comparisons are ill-formed in C++26, but Clang doesn't implement this yet.
+#if TEST_STD_VER <= 23 || defined(TEST_COMPILER_CLANG)
static_assert(check_equality_comparable_with<int*, int[5]>());
+#else
+static_assert(!check_equality_comparable_with<int*, int[5]>());
+#endif
static_assert(!check_equality_comparable_with<int*, int (*)()>());
static_assert(!check_equality_comparable_with<int*, int (&)()>());
static_assert(!check_equality_comparable_with<int*, int (S::*)()>());
@@ -148,7 +153,12 @@ static_assert(
static_assert(!check_equality_comparable_with < int*,
int (S::*)() const volatile&& noexcept > ());
+// Array comparisons are ill-formed in C++26, but Clang doesn't implement this yet.
+#if TEST_STD_VER <= 23 || defined(TEST_COMPILER_CLANG)
static_assert(check_equality_comparable_with<int[5], int[5]>());
+#else
+static_assert(!check_equality_comparable_with<int[5], int[5]>());
+#endif
static_assert(!check_equality_comparable_with<int[5], int (*)()>());
static_assert(!check_equality_comparable_with<int[5], int (&)()>());
static_assert(!check_equality_comparable_with<int[5], int (S::*)()>());
@@ -942,7 +952,12 @@ static_assert(
static_assert(!check_equality_comparable_with<std::nullptr_t, int>());
static_assert(check_equality_comparable_with<std::nullptr_t, int*>());
+// Array comparisons are ill-formed in C++26, but Clang doesn't implement this yet.
+#if TEST_STD_VER <= 23 || defined(TEST_COMPILER_CLANG)
static_assert(check_equality_comparable_with<std::nullptr_t, int[5]>());
+#else
+static_assert(!check_equality_comparable_with<std::nullptr_t, int[5]>());
+#endif
static_assert(check_equality_comparable_with<std::nullptr_t, int (*)()>());
static_assert(check_equality_comparable_with<std::nullptr_t, int (&)()>());
static_assert(check_equality_comparable_with<std::nullptr_t, int (S::*)()>());
diff --git a/libcxx/test/std/concepts/concepts.compare/concepts.totallyordered/totally_ordered.compile.pass.cpp b/libcxx/test/std/concepts/concepts.compare/concepts.totallyordered/totally_ordered.compile.pass.cpp
index 6f8324eaf7647..5959f70cf3963 100644
--- a/libcxx/test/std/concepts/concepts.compare/concepts.totallyordered/totally_ordered.compile.pass.cpp
+++ b/libcxx/test/std/concepts/concepts.compare/concepts.totallyordered/totally_ordered.compile.pass.cpp
@@ -55,7 +55,10 @@ static_assert(models_totally_ordered<unsigned char&&>());
static_assert(models_totally_ordered<unsigned short const&&>());
static_assert(models_totally_ordered<unsigned int volatile&&>());
static_assert(models_totally_ordered<unsigned long const volatile&&>());
+// Array comparisons are ill-formed in C++26
+#if TEST_STD_VER <= 23
static_assert(models_totally_ordered<int[5]>());
+#endif
static_assert(models_totally_ordered<int (*)(int)>());
static_assert(models_totally_ordered<int (&)(int)>());
static_assert(models_totally_ordered<int (*)(int) noexcept>());
diff --git a/libcxx/test/std/concepts/concepts.compare/concepts.totallyordered/totally_ordered_with.compile.pass.cpp b/libcxx/test/std/concepts/concepts.compare/concepts.totallyordered/totally_ordered_with.compile.pass.cpp
index dffc33265aebf..398ef445baf9d 100644
--- a/libcxx/test/std/concepts/concepts.compare/concepts.totallyordered/totally_ordered_with.compile.pass.cpp
+++ b/libcxx/test/std/concepts/concepts.compare/concepts.totallyordered/totally_ordered_with.compile.pass.cpp
@@ -89,7 +89,12 @@ static_assert(!check_totally_ordered_with<int, int (S::*)() const volatile&&>())
static_assert(!check_totally_ordered_with < int, int (S::*)() const volatile&& noexcept > ());
static_assert(check_totally_ordered_with<int*, int*>());
+// Array comparisons are ill-formed in C++26, but Clang doesn't implement this yet.
+#if TEST_STD_VER <= 23 || defined(TEST_COMPILER_CLANG)
static_assert(check_totally_ordered_with<int*, int[5]>());
+#else
+static_assert(!check_totally_ordered_with<int*, int[5]>());
+#endif
static_assert(!check_totally_ordered_with<int*, int (*)()>());
static_assert(!check_totally_ordered_with<int*, int (&)()>());
static_assert(!check_totally_ordered_with<int*, int (S::*)()>());
@@ -117,7 +122,12 @@ static_assert(!check_totally_ordered_with < int*, int (S::*)() volatile&& noexce
static_assert(!check_totally_ordered_with<int*, int (S::*)() const volatile&&>());
static_assert(!check_totally_ordered_with < int*, int (S::*)() const volatile&& noexcept > ());
+// Array comparisons are ill-formed in C++26, but Clang doesn't implement this yet.
+#if TEST_STD_VER <= 23 || defined(TEST_COMPILER_CLANG)
static_assert(check_totally_ordered_with<int[5], int[5]>());
+#else
+static_assert(!check_totally_ordered_with<int[5], int[5]>());
+#endif
static_assert(!check_totally_ordered_with<int[5], int (*)()>());
static_assert(!check_totally_ordered_with<int[5], int (&)()>());
static_assert(!check_totally_ordered_with<int[5], int (S::*)()>());
diff --git a/libcxx/test/std/language.support/support.dynamic/new.delete/new.delete.array/new.size.except.pass.cpp b/libcxx/test/std/language.support/support.dynamic/new.delete/new.delete.array/new.size.except.pass.cpp
index 6a2b098c1b573..9ee32b8417832 100644
--- a/libcxx/test/std/language.support/support.dynamic/new.delete/new.delete.array/new.size.except.pass.cpp
+++ b/libcxx/test/std/language.support/support.dynamic/new.delete/new.delete.array/new.size.except.pass.cpp
@@ -9,6 +9,9 @@
// UNSUPPORTED: no-exceptions
// UNSUPPORTED: sanitizer-new-delete
+// GCC warns about allocating numeric_limits<size_t>::max() being too large (which we test here)
+// ADDITIONAL_COMPILE_FLAGS(gcc): -Wno-alloc-size-larger-than
+
#include <new>
#include <cassert>
#include <limits>
diff --git a/libcxx/test/std/language.support/support.dynamic/new.delete/new.delete.array/new.size.pass.cpp b/libcxx/test/std/language.support/support.dynamic/new.delete/new.delete.array/new.size.pass.cpp
index 437d064307735..4fdcc3b535a8d 100644
--- a/libcxx/test/std/language.support/support.dynamic/new.delete/new.delete.array/new.size.pass.cpp
+++ b/libcxx/test/std/language.support/support.dynamic/new.delete/new.delete.array/new.size.pass.cpp
@@ -11,6 +11,9 @@
// asan and msan will not call the new handler.
// UNSUPPORTED: sanitizer-new-delete
+// GCC warns about allocating numeric_limits<size_t>::max() being too large (which we test here)
+// ADDITIONAL_COMPILE_FLAGS(gcc): -Wno-alloc-size-larger-than
+
#include <new>
#include <cstddef>
#include <cassert>
diff --git a/libcxx/test/std/language.support/support.dynamic/new.delete/new.delete.array/new.size_align.except.pass.cpp b/libcxx/test/std/language.support/support.dynamic/new.delete/new.delete.array/new.size_align.except.pass.cpp
index 4e34ebcb46c7d..4dfaf7a30d7a2 100644
--- a/libcxx/test/std/language.support/support.dynamic/new.delete/new.delete.array/new.size_align.except.pass.cpp
+++ b/libcxx/test/std/language.support/support.dynamic/new.delete/new.delete.array/new.size_align.except.pass.cpp
@@ -9,6 +9,9 @@
// UNSUPPORTED: no-exceptions
// UNSUPPORTED: sanitizer-new-delete
+// GCC warns about allocating numeric_limits<size_t>::max() being too large (which we test here)
+// ADDITIONAL_COMPILE_FLAGS(gcc): -Wno-alloc-size-larger-than
+
// Libc++ when built for z/OS doesn't contain the aligned allocation functions,
// nor does the dynamic library shipped with z/OS.
// XFAIL: target={{.+}}-zos{{.*}}
diff --git a/libcxx/test/std/language.support/support.dynamic/new.delete/new.delete.array/new.size_align.pass.cpp b/libcxx/test/std/language.support/support.dynamic/new.delete/new.delete.array/new.size_align.pass.cpp
index c9b59ecaff396..a1b8466340a2a 100644
--- a/libcxx/test/std/language.support/support.dynamic/new.delete/new.delete.array/new.size_align.pass.cpp
+++ b/libcxx/test/std/language.support/support.dynamic/new.delete/new.delete.array/new.size_align.pass.cpp
@@ -13,6 +13,9 @@
// asan and msan will not call the new handler.
// UNSUPPORTED: sanitizer-new-delete
+// GCC warns about allocating numeric_limits<size_t>::max() being too large (which we test here)
+// ADDITIONAL_COMPILE_FLAGS(gcc): -Wno-alloc-size-larger-than
+
// Libc++ when built for z/OS doesn't contain the aligned allocation functions,
// nor does the dynamic library shipped with z/OS.
// XFAIL: target={{.+}}-zos{{.*}}
diff --git a/libcxx/test/std/language.support/support.dynamic/new.delete/new.delete.single/new.size.except.pass.cpp b/libcxx/test/std/language.support/support.dynamic/new.delete/new.delete.single/new.size.except.pass.cpp
index 6a515555e6dbd..346e881d016be 100644
--- a/libcxx/test/std/language.support/support.dynamic/new.delete/new.delete.single/new.size.except.pass.cpp
+++ b/libcxx/test/std/language.support/support.dynamic/new.delete/new.delete.single/new.size.except.pass.cpp
@@ -9,6 +9,9 @@
// UNSUPPORTED: no-exceptions
// UNSUPPORTED: sanitizer-new-delete
+// GCC warns about allocating numeric_limits<size_t>::max() being too large (which we test here)
+// ADDITIONAL_COMPILE_FLAGS(gcc): -Wno-alloc-size-larger-than
+
#include <new>
#include <cassert>
#include <limits>
diff --git a/libcxx/test/std/language.support/support.dynamic/new.delete/new.delete.single/new.size.pass.cpp b/libcxx/test/std/language.support/support.dynamic/new.delete/new.delete.single/new.size.pass.cpp
index 729ef3ec46b0c..0013dd3d0cbc3 100644
--- a/libcxx/test/std/language.support/support.dynamic/new.delete/new.delete.single/new.size.pass.cpp
+++ b/libcxx/test/std/language.support/support.dynamic/new.delete/new.delete.single/new.size.pass.cpp
@@ -11,6 +11,9 @@
// asan and msan will not call the new handler.
// UNSUPPORTED: sanitizer-new-delete
+// GCC warns about allocating numeric_limits<size_t>::max() being too large (which we test here)
+// ADDITIONAL_COMPILE_FLAGS(gcc): -Wno-alloc-size-larger-than
+
#include <new>
#include <cstddef>
#include <cassert>
diff --git a/libcxx/test/std/language.support/support.dynamic/new.delete/new.delete.single/new.size_align.except.pass.cpp b/libcxx/test/std/language.support/support.dynamic/new.delete/new.delete.single/new.size_align.except.pass.cpp
index 7694314c87bf3..fbeb880c83d8d 100644
--- a/libcxx/test/std/language.support/support.dynamic/new.delete/new.delete.single/new.size_align.except.pass.cpp
+++ b/libcxx/test/std/language.support/support.dynamic/new.delete/new.delete.single/new.size_align.except.pass.cpp
@@ -9,6 +9,9 @@
// UNSUPPORTED: no-exceptions
// UNSUPPORTED: sanitizer-new-delete
+// GCC warns about allocating numeric_limits<size_t>::max() being too large (which we test here)
+// ADDITIONAL_COMPILE_FLAGS(gcc): -Wno-alloc-size-larger-than
+
// Libc++ when built for z/OS doesn't contain the aligned allocation functions,
// nor does the dynamic library shipped with z/OS.
// XFAIL: target={{.+}}-zos{{.*}}
diff --git a/libcxx/test/std/language.support/support.dynamic/new.delete/new.delete.single/new.size_align.pass.cpp b/libcxx/test/std/language.support/support.dynamic/new.delete/new.delete.single/new.size_align.pass.cpp
index 5d321f08282b2..59ecbe205513a 100644
--- a/libcxx/test/std/language.support/support.dynamic/new.delete/new.delete.single/new.size_align.pass.cpp
+++ b/libcxx/test/std/language.support/support.dynamic/new.delete/new.delete.single/new.size_align.pass.cpp
@@ -13,6 +13,9 @@
// asan and msan will not call the new handler.
// UNSUPPORTED: sanitizer-new-delete
+// GCC warns about allocating numeric_limits<size_t>::max() being too large (which we test here)
+// ADDITIONAL_COMPILE_FLAGS(gcc): -Wno-alloc-size-larger-than
+
// Libc++ when built for z/OS doesn't contain the aligned allocation functions,
// nor does the dynamic library shipped with z/OS.
// XFAIL: target={{.+}}-zos{{.*}}
diff --git a/libcxx/test/std/numerics/rand/rand.dist/rand.dist.samp/rand.dist.samp.discrete/ctor_func.pass.cpp b/libcxx/test/std/numerics/rand/rand.dist/rand.dist.samp/rand.dist.samp.discrete/ctor_func.pass.cpp
index c3a88af92d360..c05a9434175a8 100644
--- a/libcxx/test/std/numerics/rand/rand.dist/rand.dist.samp/rand.dist.samp.discrete/ctor_func.pass.cpp
+++ b/libcxx/test/std/numerics/rand/rand.dist/rand.dist.samp/rand.dist.samp.discrete/ctor_func.pass.cpp
@@ -15,6 +15,9 @@
// discrete_distribution(size_t nw, double xmin, double xmax,
// UnaryOperation fw);
+// There is a bogus diagnostic about a too large allocation
+// ADDITIONAL_COMPILE_FLAGS(gcc): -Wno-alloc-size-larger-than
+
#include <random>
#include <cassert>
diff --git a/libcxx/test/std/numerics/rand/rand.dist/rand.dist.samp/rand.dist.samp.discrete/param_ctor_func.pass.cpp b/libcxx/test/std/numerics/rand/rand.dist/rand.dist.samp/rand.dist.samp.discrete/param_ctor_func.pass.cpp
index 7ef936b7fc355..206bf5a0eb8a2 100644
--- a/libcxx/test/std/numerics/rand/rand.dist/rand.dist.samp/rand.dist.samp.discrete/param_ctor_func.pass.cpp
+++ b/libcxx/test/std/numerics/rand/rand.dist/rand.dist.samp/rand.dist.samp.discrete/param_ctor_func.pass.cpp
@@ -15,6 +15,9 @@
// param_type(size_t nw, double xmin, double xmax,
// UnaryOperation fw);
+// There is a bogus diagnostic about a too large allocation
+// ADDITIONAL_COMPILE_FLAGS(gcc): -Wno-alloc-size-larger-than
+
#include <random>
#include <cassert>
diff --git a/libcxx/test/std/ranges/range.adaptors/range.lazy.split/general.pass.cpp b/libcxx/test/std/ranges/range.adaptors/range.lazy.split/general.pass.cpp
index f4e87bb47399e..521c0b1610bce 100644
--- a/libcxx/test/std/ranges/range.adaptors/range.lazy.split/general.pass.cpp
+++ b/libcxx/test/std/ranges/range.adaptors/range.lazy.split/general.pass.cpp
@@ -312,7 +312,10 @@ constexpr bool main_test() {
// Leading separator.
{
std::array expected = {""sv, "abc"sv, "def"sv};
+// FIXME: Why does GCC complain here?
+#ifndef TEST_COMPILER_GCC
test_one(" abc def"sv, short_sep, expected);
+#endif
test_one("12abc12def"sv, long_sep, expected);
}
@@ -326,7 +329,10 @@ constexpr bool main_test() {
// Input consisting of a single separator.
{
std::array expected = {""sv, ""sv};
+// FIXME: Why does GCC complain here?
+#ifndef TEST_COMPILER_GCC
test_one(" "sv, short_sep, expected);
+#endif
test_one("12"sv, long_sep, expected);
}
@@ -354,7 +360,10 @@ constexpr bool main_test() {
// Separators after every character.
{
std::array expected = {""sv, "a"sv, "b"sv, "c"sv, ""sv};
+// FIXME: Why does GCC complain here?
+#ifndef TEST_COMPILER_GCC
test_one(" a b c "sv, short_sep, expected);
+#endif
test_one("12a12b12c12"sv, long_sep, expected);
}
@@ -383,7 +392,10 @@ constexpr bool main_test() {
// Terminating null as a separator.
{
std::array expected = {"abc"sv, "def"sv};
+// FIXME: Why does GCC complain here?
+#ifndef TEST_COMPILER_GCC
test_one("abc\0def"sv, '\0', expected);
+#endif
test_one("abc\0\0def"sv, "\0\0"sv, expected);
}
diff --git a/libcxx/test/std/utilities/expected/expected.expected/monadic/transform.pass.cpp b/libcxx/test/std/utilities/expected/expected.expected/monadic/transform.pass.cpp
index cbd54d623c0f4..97c1e4a40f355 100644
--- a/libcxx/test/std/utilities/expected/expected.expected/monadic/transform.pass.cpp
+++ b/libcxx/test/std/utilities/expected/expected.expected/monadic/transform.pass.cpp
@@ -9,8 +9,8 @@
// UNSUPPORTED: c++03, c++11, c++14, c++17, c++20
// GCC has a issue for `Guaranteed copy elision for potentially-overlapping non-static data members`,
-// please refer to: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108333
-// XFAIL: gcc-14
+// please refer to: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98995
+// XFAIL: gcc-14, gcc-15
// <expected>
diff --git a/libcxx/test/std/utilities/expected/expected.expected/monadic/transform_error.pass.cpp b/libcxx/test/std/utilities/expected/expected.expected/monadic/transform_error.pass.cpp
index a19e17b01f6a9..9570b2faac692 100644
--- a/libcxx/test/std/utilities/expected/expected.expected/monadic/transform_error.pass.cpp
+++ b/libcxx/test/std/utilities/expected/expected.expected/monadic/transform_error.pass.cpp
@@ -9,8 +9,8 @@
// UNSUPPORTED: c++03, c++11, c++14, c++17, c++20
// GCC has a issue for `Guaranteed copy elision for potentially-overlapping non-static data members`,
-// please refer to: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108333.
-// XFAIL: gcc-14
+// please refer to: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98995.
+// XFAIL: gcc-14, gcc-15
// <expected>
diff --git a/libcxx/test/std/utilities/expected/expected.void/monadic/transform_error.pass.cpp b/libcxx/test/std/utilities/expected/expected.void/monadic/transform_error.pass.cpp
index f6d3011d1ea96..2ec15b51d11ea 100644
--- a/libcxx/test/std/utilities/expected/expected.void/monadic/transform_error.pass.cpp
+++ b/libcxx/test/std/utilities/expected/expected.void/monadic/transform_error.pass.cpp
@@ -9,8 +9,8 @@
// UNSUPPORTED: c++03, c++11, c++14, c++17, c++20
// GCC has a issue for `Guaranteed copy elision for potentially-overlapping non-static data members`,
-// please refer to: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108333
-// XFAIL: gcc-14
+// please refer to: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98995
+// XFAIL: gcc-14, gcc-15
// <expected>
diff --git a/libcxx/test/std/utilities/format/format.formatter/format.formatter.spec/formatter.char_array.pass.cpp b/libcxx/test/std/utilities/format/format.formatter/format.formatter.spec/formatter.char_array.pass.cpp
index 1b3ff52d22d58..e6bedee788745 100644
--- a/libcxx/test/std/utilities/format/format.formatter/format.formatter.spec/formatter.char_array.pass.cpp
+++ b/libcxx/test/std/utilities/format/format.formatter/format.formatter.spec/formatter.char_array.pass.cpp
@@ -8,7 +8,7 @@
// UNSUPPORTED: c++03, c++11, c++14, c++17
// TODO FMT __builtin_memcpy isn't constexpr in GCC
-// UNSUPPORTED: gcc-14
+// UNSUPPORTED: gcc-14, gcc-15
// <format>
diff --git a/libcxx/test/std/utilities/meta/meta.rel/is_virtual_base_of.pass.cpp b/libcxx/test/std/utilities/meta/meta.rel/is_virtual_base_of.pass.cpp
index f443d2030961d..47c95c64a0855 100644
--- a/libcxx/test/std/utilities/meta/meta.rel/is_virtual_base_of.pass.cpp
+++ b/libcxx/test/std/utilities/meta/meta.rel/is_virtual_base_of.pass.cpp
@@ -18,6 +18,8 @@
#include <type_traits>
#include <cassert>
+#include "test_macros.h"
+
template <bool expected, class Base, class Derived>
void test() {
// Test the type of the variables
@@ -98,8 +100,13 @@ int main(int, char**) {
// Test with virtual inheritance
{
+#ifdef TEST_COMPILER_GCC // FIXME: Is this a GCC or Clang bug? Or is the standards wording ambiguous?
+ test<true, Base, Derived3Virtual>();
+ test<true, Derived, Derived3Virtual>();
+#else
test<false, Base, Derived3Virtual>();
test<false, Derived, Derived3Virtual>();
+#endif
test<true, Derived2b, Derived3Virtual>();
test<true, Derived2a, Derived3Virtual>();
test<true, Base, DerivedPrivate>();
diff --git a/libcxx/test/std/utilities/meta/meta.unary/dependent_return_type.compile.pass.cpp b/libcxx/test/std/utilities/meta/meta.unary/dependent_return_type.pass.cpp
similarity index 96%
rename from libcxx/test/std/utilities/meta/meta.unary/dependent_return_type.compile.pass.cpp
rename to libcxx/test/std/utilities/meta/meta.unary/dependent_return_type.pass.cpp
index 935a6e3db0017..4951e9a4a2bf6 100644
--- a/libcxx/test/std/utilities/meta/meta.unary/dependent_return_type.compile.pass.cpp
+++ b/libcxx/test/std/utilities/meta/meta.unary/dependent_return_type.pass.cpp
@@ -168,3 +168,6 @@ void instantiate() {
void_t<int>();
#endif
}
+
+// This is not a .compile.pass.cpp, because GCC only complains in CodeGen about incorrect builtins usage
+int main() {}
diff --git a/libcxx/test/std/utilities/meta/meta.unary/meta.unary.prop/is_implicit_lifetime.pass.cpp b/libcxx/test/std/utilities/meta/meta.unary/meta.unary.prop/is_implicit_lifetime.pass.cpp
index 681ad13a07dfd..afd76e65060e3 100644
--- a/libcxx/test/std/utilities/meta/meta.unary/meta.unary.prop/is_implicit_lifetime.pass.cpp
+++ b/libcxx/test/std/utilities/meta/meta.unary/meta.unary.prop/is_implicit_lifetime.pass.cpp
@@ -9,7 +9,7 @@
// UNSUPPORTED: c++03, c++11, c++14, c++17, c++20
// These compilers don't support __builtin_is_implicit_lifetime yet.
-// UNSUPPORTED: clang-18, clang-19, gcc-14, apple-clang-15, apple-clang-16, apple-clang-17
+// UNSUPPORTED: clang-18, clang-19, gcc-14, gcc-15, apple-clang-15, apple-clang-16, apple-clang-17
// <type_traits>
diff --git a/libcxx/test/std/utilities/optional/optional.specalg/make_optional_explicit.pass.cpp b/libcxx/test/std/utilities/optional/optional.specalg/make_optional_explicit.pass.cpp
index e7931e07e31d1..012ab685060e5 100644
--- a/libcxx/test/std/utilities/optional/optional.specalg/make_optional_explicit.pass.cpp
+++ b/libcxx/test/std/utilities/optional/optional.specalg/make_optional_explicit.pass.cpp
@@ -12,6 +12,9 @@
// template <class T, class... Args>
// constexpr optional<T> make_optional(Args&&... args);
+// GCC crashes on this file
+// XFAIL: gcc-15
+
#include <optional>
#include <string>
#include <memory>
diff --git a/libcxx/test/std/utilities/optional/optional.specalg/make_optional_explicit_initializer_list.pass.cpp b/libcxx/test/std/utilities/optional/optional.specalg/make_optional_explicit_initializer_list.pass.cpp
index 80371d6333712..0234aaa1e2880 100644
--- a/libcxx/test/std/utilities/optional/optional.specalg/make_optional_explicit_initializer_list.pass.cpp
+++ b/libcxx/test/std/utilities/optional/optional.specalg/make_optional_explicit_initializer_list.pass.cpp
@@ -12,6 +12,9 @@
// template <class T, class U, class... Args>
// constexpr optional<T> make_optional(initializer_list<U> il, Args&&... args);
+// GCC crashes on this file
+// XFAIL: gcc-15
+
#include <cassert>
#include <memory>
#include <optional>
diff --git a/libcxx/test/std/utilities/tuple/tuple.tuple/tuple.cnstr/PR31384.pass.cpp b/libcxx/test/std/utilities/tuple/tuple.tuple/tuple.cnstr/PR31384.pass.cpp
index e6812e9a3a30a..ae5984c155300 100644
--- a/libcxx/test/std/utilities/tuple/tuple.tuple/tuple.cnstr/PR31384.pass.cpp
+++ b/libcxx/test/std/utilities/tuple/tuple.tuple/tuple.cnstr/PR31384.pass.cpp
@@ -9,7 +9,7 @@
// UNSUPPORTED: c++03
// FIXME: Why does this start to fail with GCC 14?
-// XFAIL: !(c++11 || c++14) && gcc-14
+// XFAIL: !(c++11 || c++14) && (gcc-14 || gcc-15)
// See https://llvm.org/PR31384.
More information about the libcxx-commits
mailing list