[libcxx-commits] [libcxx] WIP - [libc++][string] P2587R3: `to_string` or not `to_string` (PR #78100)

[Hristo Hristov via libcxx-commits]

H-G-Hristov wrote:

> IMO we should discuss whether we can just backport this to all standards modes. The committee seems to be fine with this being hypothetically breaking after all. That would allow us to just update the definition in the dylib and have the FTM set when a dylib that is new enough is used instead of introducing new symbols. (FWiW I also don't understand why you're introducing both an underscored version and an inline namespace)

Thanks. I guess by the time when we could implement this, the final version will look different.

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/78100