[libcxx-commits] [libcxx] [libc++] Verify that LWG4140 is implemented (PR #128624)
Mark de Wever via libcxx-commits
libcxx-commits at lists.llvm.org
Thu Mar 6 08:58:11 PST 2025
================
@@ -98,7 +98,7 @@
"`LWG4126 <https://wg21.link/LWG4126>`__","Some feature-test macros for fully freestanding features are not yet marked freestanding","2024-11 (Wrocław)","","",""
"`LWG4134 <https://wg21.link/LWG4134>`__","Issue with Philox algorithm specification","2024-11 (Wrocław)","","",""
"`LWG4135 <https://wg21.link/LWG4135>`__","The helper lambda of ``std::erase`` for list should specify return type as ``bool``","2024-11 (Wrocław)","|Complete|","21",""
-"`LWG4140 <https://wg21.link/LWG4140>`__","Useless default constructors for bit reference types","2024-11 (Wrocław)","","",""
+"`LWG4140 <https://wg21.link/LWG4140>`__","Useless default constructors for bit reference types","2024-11 (Wrocław)","|Nothing To Do|","",""
----------------
mordante wrote:
The constructors were only declared, but not defined in the Standard. So that's why I feel `Nothing To Do` is fine.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/128624
More information about the libcxx-commits
mailing list