[libcxx-commits] [libcxx] Fix async test (PR #146240)
via libcxx-commits
libcxx-commits at lists.llvm.org
Sat Jun 28 14:01:01 PDT 2025
llvmbot wrote:
<!--LLVM PR SUMMARY COMMENT-->
@llvm/pr-subscribers-libcxx
Author: Eric (EricWF)
<details>
<summary>Changes</summary>
It seems to me the intention of `in_async.wait(...)` was to wait for the value to be set to true, which requires a call of `wait(false)` (waits if value matches argument).
As a drive by change scoped_lock to unique_lock, since there shouldn't be any functional difference between the two in this test.
Alternatively, the test could be written with a condition variable directly.
---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/146240.diff
1 Files Affected:
- (modified) libcxx/test/std/thread/futures/futures.async/wait_on_destruct.pass.cpp (+2-2)
``````````diff
diff --git a/libcxx/test/std/thread/futures/futures.async/wait_on_destruct.pass.cpp b/libcxx/test/std/thread/futures/futures.async/wait_on_destruct.pass.cpp
index 8260ec3dfcaf4..6ab9f1d0b1afb 100644
--- a/libcxx/test/std/thread/futures/futures.async/wait_on_destruct.pass.cpp
+++ b/libcxx/test/std/thread/futures/futures.async/wait_on_destruct.pass.cpp
@@ -30,11 +30,11 @@ int main(int, char**) {
auto v = std::async(std::launch::async, [&in_async, value = 1]() mutable {
in_async = true;
in_async.notify_all();
- std::scoped_lock thread_lock(mux);
+ std::unique_lock thread_lock(mux);
value = 4;
(void)value;
});
- in_async.wait(true);
+ in_async.wait(false);
lock.unlock();
return 0;
``````````
</details>
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/146240
More information about the libcxx-commits
mailing list