[libcxx-commits] [libcxx] [libc++] Implement comparison operators for `tuple` added in C++23 (PR #148799)

[Louis Dionne via libcxx-commits]

================
@@ -60,7 +60,7 @@
 "`P1642R11 <https://wg21.link/P1642R11>`__","Freestanding ``[utilities]``, ``[ranges]``, and ``[iterators]``","2022-07 (Virtual)","","",""
 "`P1899R3 <https://wg21.link/P1899R3>`__","``stride_view``","2022-07 (Virtual)","","",""
 "`P2093R14 <https://wg21.link/P2093R14>`__","Formatted output","2022-07 (Virtual)","|Complete|","18",""
-"`P2165R4 <https://wg21.link/P2165R4>`__","Compatibility between ``tuple``, ``pair`` and ``tuple-like`` objects","2022-07 (Virtual)","|Partial|","","Only the part for ``zip_view`` is implemented."
+"`P2165R4 <https://wg21.link/P2165R4>`__","Compatibility between ``tuple``, ``pair`` and ``tuple-like`` objects","2022-07 (Virtual)","|Partial|","","Changes of ``tuple``, ``adjacent_view``, and ``cartesian_product_view`` are not yet implemented."
----------------
ldionne wrote:

In principle, this would need to be an update to the `BEGIN-RST-NOTES` tag on https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/105200. But I agree this is not ergonomic since you really want the change to be associated to this PR and blameable somehow. Perhaps this means that we should make the status pages be the canonical representation of our conformance state, or perhaps it means that the version of the notes in the status pages should be the canonical ones? As I said in #148874, I'd love to find a workflow that works and is relatively simple.

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/148799