[libcxx-commits] [libcxx] [libc++] Refactor the sequence container benchmarks (PR #119763)
Peng Liu via libcxx-commits
libcxx-commits at lists.llvm.org
Tue Jan 14 17:00:21 PST 2025
================
@@ -0,0 +1,435 @@
+// -*- C++ -*-
+//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
+//
+// Part of the LLVM Project, under the Apache License v2.0 with LLVM Exceptions.
+// See https://llvm.org/LICENSE.txt for license information.
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: Apache-2.0 WITH LLVM-exception
+//
+//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
+
+#ifndef TEST_BENCHMARKS_CONTAINERS_CONTAINER_BENCHMARKS_H
+#define TEST_BENCHMARKS_CONTAINERS_CONTAINER_BENCHMARKS_H
+
+#include <cstddef>
+#include <iterator> // for std::next
+#include <ranges> // for std::from_range
+#include <string>
+#include <vector>
+
+#include "benchmark/benchmark.h"
+#include "test_iterators.h"
+#include "test_macros.h"
+
+namespace ContainerBenchmarks {
+
+template <class Container>
+void DoNotOptimizeData(Container& c) {
+ if constexpr (requires { c.data(); }) {
+ benchmark::DoNotOptimize(c.data());
+ } else {
+ benchmark::DoNotOptimize(&c);
+ }
+}
+
+//
+// Sequence container operations
+//
+template <class Container>
+void BM_ctor_size(benchmark::State& st) {
+ auto size = st.range(0);
+ char buffer[sizeof(Container)];
+ for (auto _ : st) {
+ std::construct_at(reinterpret_cast<Container*>(buffer), size);
+ benchmark::DoNotOptimize(buffer);
+ st.PauseTiming();
+ std::destroy_at(reinterpret_cast<Container*>(buffer));
+ st.ResumeTiming();
+ }
+}
+
+template <class Container>
+void BM_ctor_size_value(benchmark::State& st) {
+ using ValueType = typename Container::value_type;
+ const auto size = st.range(0);
+ ValueType value{};
+ benchmark::DoNotOptimize(value);
+ char buffer[sizeof(Container)];
+ for (auto _ : st) {
+ std::construct_at(reinterpret_cast<Container*>(buffer), size, value);
+ benchmark::DoNotOptimize(buffer);
+ st.PauseTiming();
+ std::destroy_at(reinterpret_cast<Container*>(buffer));
+ st.ResumeTiming();
+ }
+}
+
+template <class Container>
+void BM_ctor_iter_iter(benchmark::State& st) {
+ using ValueType = typename Container::value_type;
+ const auto size = st.range(0);
+ std::vector<ValueType> in(size);
+ const auto begin = in.begin();
+ const auto end = in.end();
+ benchmark::DoNotOptimize(in);
+ char buffer[sizeof(Container)];
+ for (auto _ : st) {
+ std::construct_at(reinterpret_cast<Container*>(buffer), begin, end);
+ benchmark::DoNotOptimize(buffer);
+ st.PauseTiming();
+ std::destroy_at(reinterpret_cast<Container*>(buffer));
+ st.ResumeTiming();
+ }
+}
+
+#if TEST_STD_VER >= 23
+template <class Container>
+void BM_ctor_from_range(benchmark::State& st) {
+ using ValueType = typename Container::value_type;
+ const auto size = st.range(0);
+ std::vector<ValueType> in(size);
+ benchmark::DoNotOptimize(in);
+ char buffer[sizeof(Container)];
+ for (auto _ : st) {
+ std::construct_at(reinterpret_cast<Container*>(buffer), std::from_range, in);
+ benchmark::DoNotOptimize(buffer);
+ st.PauseTiming();
+ std::destroy_at(reinterpret_cast<Container*>(buffer));
+ st.ResumeTiming();
+ }
+}
+#endif
+
+template <class Container>
+void BM_ctor_copy(benchmark::State& st) {
+ auto size = st.range(0);
+ Container c(size);
+ char buffer[sizeof(Container)];
+ for (auto _ : st) {
+ std::construct_at(reinterpret_cast<Container*>(buffer), c);
+ benchmark::DoNotOptimize(buffer);
+ st.PauseTiming();
+ std::destroy_at(reinterpret_cast<Container*>(buffer));
+ st.ResumeTiming();
+ }
+}
+
+template <class Container>
+void BM_assignment(benchmark::State& st) {
+ auto size = st.range(0);
+ Container c1;
+ Container c2(size);
+ for (auto _ : st) {
+ c1 = c2;
+ DoNotOptimizeData(c1);
+ DoNotOptimizeData(c2);
+ }
+}
+
+template <typename Container>
+void BM_assign_inputiter(benchmark::State& st) {
+ using ValueType = typename Container::value_type;
+ auto size = st.range(0);
+ std::vector<ValueType> inputs(size);
+ Container c(inputs.begin(), inputs.end());
+ DoNotOptimizeData(c);
+ DoNotOptimizeData(inputs);
+ ValueType* first = inputs.data();
+ ValueType* last = inputs.data() + inputs.size();
+
+ for (auto _ : st) {
+ c.assign(cpp17_input_iterator(first), cpp17_input_iterator(last));
+ benchmark::ClobberMemory();
+ }
+}
+
+template <class Container>
+void BM_insert_middle(benchmark::State& st) {
+ using ValueType = typename Container::value_type;
+ const int count = st.range(0);
+ std::vector<ValueType> inputs(count);
+ Container c(inputs.begin(), inputs.end());
+ DoNotOptimizeData(c);
+
+ ValueType value{};
+ benchmark::DoNotOptimize(value);
+
+ auto mid = std::next(c.begin(), count / 2);
+ for (auto _ : st) {
+ auto inserted = c.insert(mid, value);
+ DoNotOptimizeData(c);
+
+ st.PauseTiming();
+ mid = c.erase(inserted);
+ st.ResumeTiming();
+ }
+}
+
+template <class Container>
+void BM_insert_start(benchmark::State& st) {
+ using ValueType = typename Container::value_type;
+ const int count = st.range(0);
+ std::vector<ValueType> inputs(count);
+ Container c(inputs.begin(), inputs.end());
+ DoNotOptimizeData(c);
+
+ ValueType value{};
+ benchmark::DoNotOptimize(value);
+
+ for (auto _ : st) {
+ auto inserted = c.insert(c.begin(), value);
+ DoNotOptimizeData(c);
+
+ st.PauseTiming();
+ c.erase(inserted);
+ st.ResumeTiming();
+ }
+}
+
+template <class Container>
+void BM_erase_middle(benchmark::State& st) {
+ using ValueType = typename Container::value_type;
+ const int count = st.range(0);
+ std::vector<ValueType> inputs(count);
+ Container c(inputs.begin(), inputs.end());
+ DoNotOptimizeData(c);
+
+ ValueType value{};
+ benchmark::DoNotOptimize(value);
+
+ auto mid = std::next(c.begin(), count / 2);
+ for (auto _ : st) {
+ c.erase(mid);
+ DoNotOptimizeData(c);
+
+ st.PauseTiming();
+ c.insert(c.end(), value); // re-insert an element at the end to avoid needing a new container
+ mid = std::next(c.begin(), c.size() / 2);
+ st.ResumeTiming();
----------------
winner245 wrote:
My understanding is that your test first erases the mid element, and then appends one at the end. So there would be no reallocation, and only in that case we may reuse the return value of `erase()` as the updated mid.
But in general you are right, as `insert` may lead to reallocation, and recalculating mid is required. Given that recalculating mid is very fast, it won't impact your benchmark testing.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/119763
More information about the libcxx-commits
mailing list