[libcxx-commits] [libcxx] [libc++] Provide sized deallocation declarations even when the compiler doesn't support sized deallocation (PR #125577)

[Nikolas Klauser via libcxx-commits]

philnik777 wrote:

> > Yes, that's the point of the flag. You have to explicitly use the sized deallocation overload with this patch, but I don't see when you'd want to be able to manually call the function but not tell the compiler that it exists
> 
> Right, but that's a separate issue -- I'd like to first make sure this patch doesn't result in linker errors (in some contexts) before discussing whether we should do anything in the library to prevent silently ignoring user's overload.

I don't think that's a separate issue. AFAICT this is the only scenario this patch allows. If you thought I meant this could lead to linker issues for code that doesn't manually call the sized overloads, I'm sorry for the confusion. I didn't mean that.

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/125577