[libcxx-commits] [libcxx] [libc++] Support sorting consteval-only ranges (PR #134623)
Nikolas Klauser via libcxx-commits
libcxx-commits at lists.llvm.org
Wed Apr 9 14:02:49 PDT 2025
================
@@ -912,30 +900,63 @@ using __sort_is_specialized_in_library _LIBCPP_NODEBUG = __is_any_of<
long double>;
template <class _AlgPolicy, class _Type, __enable_if_t<__sort_is_specialized_in_library<_Type>::value, int> = 0>
-_LIBCPP_HIDE_FROM_ABI void __sort_dispatch(_Type* __first, _Type* __last, __less<>&) {
- __less<_Type> __comp;
- std::__sort<__less<_Type>&, _Type*>(__first, __last, __comp);
+_LIBCPP_HIDE_FROM_ABI _LIBCPP_CONSTEXPR_SINCE_CXX20 void __sort_dispatch(_Type* __first, _Type* __last, __less<>&) {
+#if _LIBCPP_STD_VER >= 20
+ if (std::is_constant_evaluated()) {
+ auto __depth_limit = static_cast<ptrdiff_t>(2 * std::__bit_log2(static_cast<size_t>(__last - __first)));
+ std::__introsort<_ClassicAlgPolicy, ranges::less, _Type*, __use_branchless_sort<ranges::less, _Type*>>(
+ __first, __last, ranges::less{}, __depth_limit);
+ } else
+#endif
----------------
philnik777 wrote:
Then please revert these changes. It's not at all obvious to me what changes actually fix anything (and FWIW I'm not convinced these changes are a good idea).
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/134623
More information about the libcxx-commits
mailing list