[libcxx-commits] [libcxx] [libc++] Simplify the implementation of std::get for pairs (PR #114984)
Louis Dionne via libcxx-commits
libcxx-commits at lists.llvm.org
Wed Apr 2 07:19:33 PDT 2025
================
@@ -629,42 +629,42 @@ get(const pair<_T1, _T2>&& __p) _NOEXCEPT {
#if _LIBCPP_STD_VER >= 14
template <class _T1, class _T2>
inline _LIBCPP_HIDE_FROM_ABI constexpr _T1& get(pair<_T1, _T2>& __p) _NOEXCEPT {
- return __get_pair<0>::get(__p);
+ return __p.first;
}
template <class _T1, class _T2>
inline _LIBCPP_HIDE_FROM_ABI constexpr _T1 const& get(pair<_T1, _T2> const& __p) _NOEXCEPT {
- return __get_pair<0>::get(__p);
+ return __p.first;
}
template <class _T1, class _T2>
inline _LIBCPP_HIDE_FROM_ABI constexpr _T1&& get(pair<_T1, _T2>&& __p) _NOEXCEPT {
- return __get_pair<0>::get(std::move(__p));
+ return std::forward<_T1&&>(__p.first);
}
template <class _T1, class _T2>
inline _LIBCPP_HIDE_FROM_ABI constexpr _T1 const&& get(pair<_T1, _T2> const&& __p) _NOEXCEPT {
- return __get_pair<0>::get(std::move(__p));
+ return std::forward<_T1 const&&>(__p.first);
}
template <class _T1, class _T2>
----------------
ldionne wrote:
I would change this to `template <class _T2, class _T1>` instead, that seems a lot more readable.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/114984
More information about the libcxx-commits
mailing list