[libcxx-commits] [libcxx] 6f5dd65 - [libc++][docs] Fix inline code style - use double backticks (#108974)

via libcxx-commits libcxx-commits at lists.llvm.org
Tue Sep 17 08:12:48 PDT 2024


Author: Hristo Hristov
Date: 2024-09-17T11:12:44-04:00
New Revision: 6f5dd6563017a11cf1486654d2350ef97054abef

URL: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/6f5dd6563017a11cf1486654d2350ef97054abef
DIFF: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/6f5dd6563017a11cf1486654d2350ef97054abef.diff

LOG: [libc++][docs] Fix inline code style - use double backticks (#108974)

This is an apparrent omission. Single backick (Markdown style) was used
instead of double backtick for inline code style.

Added: 
    

Modified: 
    libcxx/docs/Contributing.rst

Removed: 
    


################################################################################
diff  --git a/libcxx/docs/Contributing.rst b/libcxx/docs/Contributing.rst
index f81c537e00c243..b15fc88943d59b 100644
--- a/libcxx/docs/Contributing.rst
+++ b/libcxx/docs/Contributing.rst
@@ -168,7 +168,7 @@ sure you don't forget anything:
 
 - Did you add the relevant feature test macro(s) for your feature? Did you update the ``generate_feature_test_macro_components.py`` script with it?
 - Did you run the ``libcxx-generate-files`` target and verify its output?
-- If needed, did you add `_LIBCPP_PUSH_MACROS` and `_LIBCPP_POP_MACROS` to the relevant headers?
+- If needed, did you add ``_LIBCPP_PUSH_MACROS`` and ``_LIBCPP_POP_MACROS`` to the relevant headers?
 
 The review process
 ==================


        


More information about the libcxx-commits mailing list