[libcxx-commits] [libcxx] 6f5dd65 - [libc++][docs] Fix inline code style - use double backticks (#108974)
via libcxx-commits
libcxx-commits at lists.llvm.org
Tue Sep 17 08:12:48 PDT 2024
Author: Hristo Hristov
Date: 2024-09-17T11:12:44-04:00
New Revision: 6f5dd6563017a11cf1486654d2350ef97054abef
URL: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/6f5dd6563017a11cf1486654d2350ef97054abef
DIFF: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/6f5dd6563017a11cf1486654d2350ef97054abef.diff
LOG: [libc++][docs] Fix inline code style - use double backticks (#108974)
This is an apparrent omission. Single backick (Markdown style) was used
instead of double backtick for inline code style.
Added:
Modified:
libcxx/docs/Contributing.rst
Removed:
################################################################################
diff --git a/libcxx/docs/Contributing.rst b/libcxx/docs/Contributing.rst
index f81c537e00c243..b15fc88943d59b 100644
--- a/libcxx/docs/Contributing.rst
+++ b/libcxx/docs/Contributing.rst
@@ -168,7 +168,7 @@ sure you don't forget anything:
- Did you add the relevant feature test macro(s) for your feature? Did you update the ``generate_feature_test_macro_components.py`` script with it?
- Did you run the ``libcxx-generate-files`` target and verify its output?
-- If needed, did you add `_LIBCPP_PUSH_MACROS` and `_LIBCPP_POP_MACROS` to the relevant headers?
+- If needed, did you add ``_LIBCPP_PUSH_MACROS`` and ``_LIBCPP_POP_MACROS`` to the relevant headers?
The review process
==================
More information about the libcxx-commits
mailing list