[libcxx-commits] [libcxx] [libc++] Add support for bounded iterators in std::array (PR #110729)

[Konstantin Varlamov via libcxx-commits]

================
@@ -0,0 +1,268 @@
+// -*- C++ -*-
+//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
+//
+// Part of the LLVM Project, under the Apache License v2.0 with LLVM Exceptions.
+// See https://llvm.org/LICENSE.txt for license information.
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: Apache-2.0 WITH LLVM-exception
+//
+//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
+
+#ifndef _LIBCPP___ITERATOR_STATIC_BOUNDED_ITER_H
+#define _LIBCPP___ITERATOR_STATIC_BOUNDED_ITER_H
+
+#include <__assert>
+#include <__compare/ordering.h>
+#include <__compare/three_way_comparable.h>
+#include <__config>
+#include <__cstddef/size_t.h>
+#include <__iterator/iterator_traits.h>
+#include <__memory/pointer_traits.h>
+#include <__type_traits/enable_if.h>
+#include <__type_traits/integral_constant.h>
+#include <__type_traits/is_convertible.h>
+#include <__utility/move.h>
+
+#if !defined(_LIBCPP_HAS_NO_PRAGMA_SYSTEM_HEADER)
+#  pragma GCC system_header
+#endif
+
+_LIBCPP_PUSH_MACROS
+#include <__undef_macros>
+
+_LIBCPP_BEGIN_NAMESPACE_STD
+
+// Iterator wrapper that carries the valid range it is allowed to access, but where
----------------
var-const wrote:

Very optional nit: this first sentence seems a little redundant with the next one. I slightly prefer the next sentence (_"This is an iterator wrapper..."_) as it's more detailed and IMO flows better, so I'd just omit this opening. Completely optional.

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/110729