[libcxx-commits] [libcxx] [NFC][libc++] Mark LWG3951 as implemented (PR #93191)

[A. Jiang via libcxx-commits]

================
@@ -29,7 +29,7 @@
 "`3947 <https://wg21.link/LWG3947>`__","Unexpected constraints on ``adjacent_transform_view::base()``","Kona November 2023","","","|ranges|"
 "`3948 <https://wg21.link/LWG3948>`__","``possibly-const-range and as-const-pointer`` should be ``noexcept``","Kona November 2023","","","|ranges|"
 "`3949 <https://wg21.link/LWG3949>`__","``std::atomic<bool>``'s trivial destructor dropped in C++17 spec wording","Kona November 2023","","",""
-"`3951 <https://wg21.link/LWG3951>`__","[expected.object.swap]: Using ``value()`` instead of ``has_value()``","Kona November 2023","","",""
+"`3951 <https://wg21.link/LWG3951>`__","[expected.object.swap]: Using ``value()`` instead of ``has_value()``","Kona November 2023","|Complete|","18.0",""
----------------
frederick-vs-ja wrote:

It seems that LWG3951 was implemented when initially implementing `expected`, see e356f681f6c46ac35f933dc0cef3b25ceee8b210.

```suggestion
"`3951 <https://wg21.link/LWG3951>`__","[expected.object.swap]: Using ``value()`` instead of ``has_value()``","Kona November 2023","|Complete|","16.0",""
```

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/93191