[libcxx-commits] [libcxx] [libc++] Workaround clang bug in __has_unique_object_representations (PR #95314)

[Nikolas Klauser via libcxx-commits]

================
@@ -14,95 +14,95 @@
 
 #include <type_traits>
 
-#include "test_macros.h"
-
-template <class T>
-void test_has_unique_object_representations()
-{
-    static_assert( std::has_unique_object_representations<T>::value, "");
-    static_assert( std::has_unique_object_representations<const T>::value, "");
-    static_assert( std::has_unique_object_representations<volatile T>::value, "");
-    static_assert( std::has_unique_object_representations<const volatile T>::value, "");
-
-    static_assert( std::has_unique_object_representations_v<T>, "");
-    static_assert( std::has_unique_object_representations_v<const T>, "");
-    static_assert( std::has_unique_object_representations_v<volatile T>, "");
-    static_assert( std::has_unique_object_representations_v<const volatile T>, "");
+template <bool ExpectedValue, class T>
----------------
philnik777 wrote:

While we're at it, could we make this a `.compile.pass.cpp`?

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/95314