[libcxx-commits] [libcxx] [libc++] Overhaul the PSTL dispatching mechanism (PR #88131)
Nikolas Klauser via libcxx-commits
libcxx-commits at lists.llvm.org
Tue Jun 11 01:30:12 PDT 2024
================
@@ -509,67 +151,31 @@ equal(_ExecutionPolicy&& __policy,
_Pred __pred) {
_LIBCPP_REQUIRE_CPP17_FORWARD_ITERATOR(_ForwardIterator1, "equal requires ForwardIterators");
_LIBCPP_REQUIRE_CPP17_FORWARD_ITERATOR(_ForwardIterator2, "equal requires ForwardIterators");
- auto __res = std::__equal(__policy, std::move(__first1), std::move(__last1), std::move(__first2), std::move(__pred));
- if (!__res)
- std::__throw_bad_alloc();
- return *__res;
+ using _Implementation = __pstl::__dispatch<__pstl::__equal_3leg, __pstl::__current_configuration, _RawPolicy>;
+ return __pstl::__handle_exception<_Implementation>(
+ std::forward<_ExecutionPolicy>(__policy),
+ std::move(__first1),
+ std::move(__last1),
+ std::move(__first2),
+ std::move(__pred));
}
template <class _ExecutionPolicy,
class _ForwardIterator1,
class _ForwardIterator2,
- enable_if_t<is_execution_policy_v<__remove_cvref_t<_ExecutionPolicy>>, int> = 0>
+ class _RawPolicy = __remove_cvref_t<_ExecutionPolicy>,
+ enable_if_t<is_execution_policy_v<_RawPolicy>, int> = 0>
_LIBCPP_HIDE_FROM_ABI bool
equal(_ExecutionPolicy&& __policy, _ForwardIterator1 __first1, _ForwardIterator1 __last1, _ForwardIterator2 __first2) {
_LIBCPP_REQUIRE_CPP17_FORWARD_ITERATOR(_ForwardIterator1, "equal requires ForwardIterators");
_LIBCPP_REQUIRE_CPP17_FORWARD_ITERATOR(_ForwardIterator2, "equal requires ForwardIterators");
- auto __res = std::__equal(__policy, std::move(__first1), std::move(__last1), std::move(__first2), std::equal_to{});
- if (!__res)
- std::__throw_bad_alloc();
- return *__res;
-}
-
-template <class _ExecutionPolicy,
- class _ForwardIterator1,
- class _ForwardIterator2,
- class _Pred,
- class _RawPolicy = __remove_cvref_t<_ExecutionPolicy>,
- enable_if_t<is_execution_policy_v<_RawPolicy>, int> = 0>
-[[nodiscard]] _LIBCPP_HIDE_FROM_ABI optional<bool>
-__equal(_ExecutionPolicy&& __policy,
- _ForwardIterator1&& __first1,
- _ForwardIterator1&& __last1,
- _ForwardIterator2&& __first2,
- _ForwardIterator2&& __last2,
- _Pred&& __pred) noexcept {
- return std::__pstl_frontend_dispatch(
- _LIBCPP_PSTL_CUSTOMIZATION_POINT(__pstl_equal, _RawPolicy),
- [&__policy](_ForwardIterator1 __g_first1,
- _ForwardIterator1 __g_last1,
- _ForwardIterator2 __g_first2,
- _ForwardIterator2 __g_last2,
- _Pred __g_pred) -> optional<bool> {
- if constexpr (__has_random_access_iterator_category<_ForwardIterator1>::value &&
- __has_random_access_iterator_category<_ForwardIterator2>::value) {
- if (__g_last1 - __g_first1 != __g_last2 - __g_first2)
- return false;
- return std::__equal(
- __policy, std::move(__g_first1), std::move(__g_last1), std::move(__g_first2), std::move(__g_pred));
- } else {
- (void)__policy; // Avoid unused lambda capture warning
- return std::equal(
- std::move(__g_first1),
- std::move(__g_last1),
- std::move(__g_first2),
- std::move(__g_last2),
- std::move(__g_pred));
- }
- },
+ using _Implementation = __pstl::__dispatch<__pstl::__equal_3leg, __pstl::__current_configuration, _RawPolicy>;
----------------
philnik777 wrote:
What does `2leg` mean?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/88131
More information about the libcxx-commits
mailing list