[libcxx-commits] [clang] [libcxx] [Clang] Implement CWG2137 (list-initialization from objects of the same type) (PR #94355)

via libcxx-commits libcxx-commits at lists.llvm.org
Tue Jun 4 07:04:40 PDT 2024


llvmbot wrote:


<!--LLVM PR SUMMARY COMMENT-->

@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang

Author: Mital Ashok (MitalAshok)

<details>
<summary>Changes</summary>

[CWG2137](https://cplusplus.github.io/CWG/issues/2137.html)

This was previously implemented and then reverted in Clang 18 as #<!-- -->77768

This also implements a workaround for [CWG2311](https://cplusplus.github.io/CWG/issues/2311.html), similarly to the 2024-03-01 comment for [CWG2742](https://cplusplus.github.io/CWG/issues/2742.html).

The exact wording this tries to implement, relative to the C++26 draft:

[over.match.list]p(1.2)

> Otherwise, or if no viable initializer-list constructor is found <ins>and the initializer list does not consist of exactly a single element with the same cv-unqualified class type as `T`</ins>, overload resolution is performed again, [...]

[dcl.init.list]p(3.7)

> Otherwise, if `T` is a class type, constructors are considered. The applicable constructors are enumerated and the best one is chosen through overload resolution. <ins>If no constructor is found and the initializer list consists of exactly a single element with the same cv-unqualified class type as `T`, the object is initialized from that element (by copy-initialization for copy-list-initialization, or by direct-initialization for direct-list-initialization). Otherwise,</ins> if a narrowing conversion (see below) is required [...]



---

Patch is 22.10 KiB, truncated to 20.00 KiB below, full version: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/94355.diff


10 Files Affected:

- (modified) clang/docs/ReleaseNotes.rst (+10) 
- (modified) clang/lib/Sema/SemaInit.cpp (+46-10) 
- (modified) clang/lib/Sema/SemaOverload.cpp (+29-12) 
- (modified) clang/test/CXX/drs/cwg14xx.cpp (-10) 
- (modified) clang/test/CXX/drs/cwg21xx.cpp (+45) 
- (modified) clang/test/CXX/drs/cwg23xx.cpp (+99) 
- (modified) clang/test/SemaCXX/cxx1z-class-template-argument-deduction.cpp (+4-1) 
- (added) clang/test/SemaCXX/single-element-init-list.cpp (+81) 
- (modified) clang/www/cxx_dr_status.html (+1-1) 
- (modified) libcxx/test/std/utilities/utility/pairs/pairs.pair/ctor.pair_U_V_move.pass.cpp (+20-1) 


``````````diff
diff --git a/clang/docs/ReleaseNotes.rst b/clang/docs/ReleaseNotes.rst
index 99580c0d28a4f..285cc1a552616 100644
--- a/clang/docs/ReleaseNotes.rst
+++ b/clang/docs/ReleaseNotes.rst
@@ -254,6 +254,16 @@ Resolutions to C++ Defect Reports
 - Clang now requires a template argument list after a template keyword.
   (`CWG96: Syntactic disambiguation using the template keyword <https://cplusplus.github.io/CWG/issues/96.html>`_).
 
+- Allow calling initializer list constructors from initializer lists with
+  a single element of the same type instead of always copying.
+  (`CWG2137: List-initialization from object of same type <https://cplusplus.github.io/CWG/issues/2137.html>`)
+
+- Speculative resolution for CWG2311 implemented so that the implementation of CWG2137 doesn't remove
+  previous cases where guaranteed copy elision was done. Given a prvalue ``e`` of class type
+  ``T``, ``T{e}`` will try to resolve an initializer list constructor and will use it if successful.
+  Otherwise, if there is no initializer list constructor, the copy will be elided as if it was ``T(e)``.
+  (`CWG2311: Missed case for guaranteed copy elision <https://cplusplus.github.io/CWG/issues/2311.html>`)
+
 C Language Changes
 ------------------
 
diff --git a/clang/lib/Sema/SemaInit.cpp b/clang/lib/Sema/SemaInit.cpp
index 79bdc8e9f8783..100e3092c1c1e 100644
--- a/clang/lib/Sema/SemaInit.cpp
+++ b/clang/lib/Sema/SemaInit.cpp
@@ -4231,7 +4231,7 @@ static OverloadingResult ResolveConstructorOverload(
 /// \param IsListInit     Is this list-initialization?
 /// \param IsInitListCopy Is this non-list-initialization resulting from a
 ///                       list-initialization from {x} where x is the same
-///                       type as the entity?
+///                       aggregate type as the entity?
 static void TryConstructorInitialization(Sema &S,
                                          const InitializedEntity &Entity,
                                          const InitializationKind &Kind,
@@ -4261,6 +4261,14 @@ static void TryConstructorInitialization(Sema &S,
         Entity.getKind() !=
             InitializedEntity::EK_LambdaToBlockConversionBlockElement);
 
+  bool CopyElisionPossible = false;
+  auto ElideConstructor = [&] {
+    // Convert qualifications if necessary.
+    Sequence.AddQualificationConversionStep(DestType, VK_PRValue);
+    if (ILE)
+      Sequence.RewrapReferenceInitList(DestType, ILE);
+  };
+
   // C++17 [dcl.init]p17:
   //     - If the initializer expression is a prvalue and the cv-unqualified
   //       version of the source type is the same class as the class of the
@@ -4273,11 +4281,33 @@ static void TryConstructorInitialization(Sema &S,
   if (S.getLangOpts().CPlusPlus17 && !RequireActualConstructor &&
       UnwrappedArgs.size() == 1 && UnwrappedArgs[0]->isPRValue() &&
       S.Context.hasSameUnqualifiedType(UnwrappedArgs[0]->getType(), DestType)) {
-    // Convert qualifications if necessary.
-    Sequence.AddQualificationConversionStep(DestType, VK_PRValue);
-    if (ILE)
-      Sequence.RewrapReferenceInitList(DestType, ILE);
-    return;
+    if (ILE && !DestType->isAggregateType()) {
+      // CWG2311: T{ prvalue_of_type_T } is not eligible for copy elision
+      // Make this an elision if this won't call an initializer-list
+      // constructor. (Always on an aggregate type or check constructors first.)
+
+      // This effectively makes our resolution as follows. The parts in angle
+      // brackets are additions.
+      // C++17 [over.match.list]p(1.2):
+      //   - If no viable initializer-list constructor is found <and the
+      //     initializer list does not consist of exactly a single element with
+      //     the same cv-unqualified class type as T>, [...]
+      // C++17 [dcl.init.list]p(3.6):
+      //   - Otherwise, if T is a class type, constructors are considered. The
+      //     applicable constructors are enumerated and the best one is chosen
+      //     through overload resolution. <If no constructor is found and the
+      //     initializer list consists of exactly a single element with the same
+      //     cv-unqualified class type as T, the object is initialized from that
+      //     element (by copy-initialization for copy-list-initialization, or by
+      //     direct-initialization for direct-list-initialization). Otherwise, >
+      //     if a narrowing conversion [...]
+      assert(!IsInitListCopy &&
+             "IsInitListCopy only possible with aggregate types");
+      CopyElisionPossible = true;
+    } else {
+      ElideConstructor();
+      return;
+    }
   }
 
   const RecordType *DestRecordType = DestType->getAs<RecordType>();
@@ -4322,6 +4352,12 @@ static void TryConstructorInitialization(Sema &S,
           S, Kind.getLocation(), Args, CandidateSet, DestType, Ctors, Best,
           CopyInitialization, AllowExplicit,
           /*OnlyListConstructors=*/true, IsListInit, RequireActualConstructor);
+
+    if (CopyElisionPossible && Result == OR_No_Viable_Function) {
+      // No initializer list candidate
+      ElideConstructor();
+      return;
+    }
   }
 
   // C++11 [over.match.list]p1:
@@ -4603,9 +4639,9 @@ static void TryListInitialization(Sema &S,
     return;
   }
 
-  // C++11 [dcl.init.list]p3, per DR1467:
-  // - If T is a class type and the initializer list has a single element of
-  //   type cv U, where U is T or a class derived from T, the object is
+  // C++11 [dcl.init.list]p3, per DR1467 and DR2137:
+  // - If T is an aggregate class and the initializer list has a single element
+  //   of type cv U, where U is T or a class derived from T, the object is
   //   initialized from that element (by copy-initialization for
   //   copy-list-initialization, or by direct-initialization for
   //   direct-list-initialization).
@@ -4616,7 +4652,7 @@ static void TryListInitialization(Sema &S,
   // - Otherwise, if T is an aggregate, [...] (continue below).
   if (S.getLangOpts().CPlusPlus11 && InitList->getNumInits() == 1 &&
       !IsDesignatedInit) {
-    if (DestType->isRecordType()) {
+    if (DestType->isRecordType() && DestType->isAggregateType()) {
       QualType InitType = InitList->getInit(0)->getType();
       if (S.Context.hasSameUnqualifiedType(InitType, DestType) ||
           S.IsDerivedFrom(InitList->getBeginLoc(), InitType, DestType)) {
diff --git a/clang/lib/Sema/SemaOverload.cpp b/clang/lib/Sema/SemaOverload.cpp
index 6c4ce1022ae27..3dd8719ad71d5 100644
--- a/clang/lib/Sema/SemaOverload.cpp
+++ b/clang/lib/Sema/SemaOverload.cpp
@@ -1628,19 +1628,36 @@ TryUserDefinedConversion(Sema &S, Expr *From, QualType ToType,
     //   called for those cases.
     if (CXXConstructorDecl *Constructor
           = dyn_cast<CXXConstructorDecl>(ICS.UserDefined.ConversionFunction)) {
-      QualType FromCanon
-        = S.Context.getCanonicalType(From->getType().getUnqualifiedType());
+      QualType FromType;
+      SourceLocation FromLoc;
+      // C++11 [over.ics.list]p6, per DR2137:
+      // C++17 [over.ics.list]p6:
+      //   If C is not an initializer-list constructor and the initializer list
+      //   has a single element of type cv U, where U is X or a class derived
+      //   from X, the implicit conversion sequence has Exact Match rank if U is
+      //   X, or Conversion rank if U is derived from X.
+      if (const auto *InitList = dyn_cast<InitListExpr>(From);
+          InitList && InitList->getNumInits() == 1 &&
+          !S.isInitListConstructor(Constructor)) {
+        const Expr *SingleInit = InitList->getInit(0);
+        FromType = SingleInit->getType();
+        FromLoc = SingleInit->getBeginLoc();
+      } else {
+        FromType = From->getType();
+        FromLoc = From->getBeginLoc();
+      }
+      QualType FromCanon =
+          S.Context.getCanonicalType(FromType.getUnqualifiedType());
       QualType ToCanon
         = S.Context.getCanonicalType(ToType).getUnqualifiedType();
-      if (Constructor->isCopyConstructor() &&
-          (FromCanon == ToCanon ||
-           S.IsDerivedFrom(From->getBeginLoc(), FromCanon, ToCanon))) {
+      if ((FromCanon == ToCanon ||
+           S.IsDerivedFrom(FromLoc, FromCanon, ToCanon))) {
         // Turn this into a "standard" conversion sequence, so that it
         // gets ranked with standard conversion sequences.
         DeclAccessPair Found = ICS.UserDefined.FoundConversionFunction;
         ICS.setStandard();
         ICS.Standard.setAsIdentityConversion();
-        ICS.Standard.setFromType(From->getType());
+        ICS.Standard.setFromType(FromType);
         ICS.Standard.setAllToTypes(ToType);
         ICS.Standard.CopyConstructor = Constructor;
         ICS.Standard.FoundCopyConstructor = Found;
@@ -5431,18 +5448,18 @@ TryListConversion(Sema &S, InitListExpr *From, QualType ToType,
       IsDesignatedInit)
     return Result;
 
-  // Per DR1467:
-  //   If the parameter type is a class X and the initializer list has a single
-  //   element of type cv U, where U is X or a class derived from X, the
-  //   implicit conversion sequence is the one required to convert the element
-  //   to the parameter type.
+  // Per DR1467 and DR2137:
+  //   If the parameter type is an aggregate class X and the initializer list
+  //   has a single element of type cv U, where U is X or a class derived from
+  //   X, the implicit conversion sequence is the one required to convert the
+  //   element to the parameter type.
   //
   //   Otherwise, if the parameter type is a character array [... ]
   //   and the initializer list has a single element that is an
   //   appropriately-typed string literal (8.5.2 [dcl.init.string]), the
   //   implicit conversion sequence is the identity conversion.
   if (From->getNumInits() == 1 && !IsDesignatedInit) {
-    if (ToType->isRecordType()) {
+    if (ToType->isRecordType() && ToType->isAggregateType()) {
       QualType InitType = From->getInit(0)->getType();
       if (S.Context.hasSameUnqualifiedType(InitType, ToType) ||
           S.IsDerivedFrom(From->getBeginLoc(), InitType, ToType))
diff --git a/clang/test/CXX/drs/cwg14xx.cpp b/clang/test/CXX/drs/cwg14xx.cpp
index f01d96ad47f3e..a23ac74443633 100644
--- a/clang/test/CXX/drs/cwg14xx.cpp
+++ b/clang/test/CXX/drs/cwg14xx.cpp
@@ -505,16 +505,6 @@ namespace cwg1467 {  // cwg1467: 3.7 c++11
     }
   } // nonaggregate
 
-  namespace SelfInitIsNotListInit {
-    struct S {
-      S();
-      explicit S(S &);
-      S(const S &);
-    };
-    S s1;
-    S s2 = {s1}; // ok, not list-initialization so we pick the non-explicit constructor
-  }
-
   struct NestedInit { int a, b, c; };
   NestedInit ni[1] = {{NestedInit{1, 2, 3}}};
 
diff --git a/clang/test/CXX/drs/cwg21xx.cpp b/clang/test/CXX/drs/cwg21xx.cpp
index 082deb42e4fa0..48588cc08b2ac 100644
--- a/clang/test/CXX/drs/cwg21xx.cpp
+++ b/clang/test/CXX/drs/cwg21xx.cpp
@@ -11,6 +11,16 @@
 // cxx98-error at -1 {{variadic macros are a C99 feature}}
 #endif
 
+namespace std {
+  typedef __SIZE_TYPE__ size_t;
+
+  template<typename E> struct initializer_list {
+    const E *p; size_t n;
+    initializer_list(const E *p, size_t n);
+    initializer_list();
+  };
+}
+
 namespace cwg2100 { // cwg2100: 12
   template<const int *P, bool = true> struct X {};
   template<typename T> struct A {
@@ -132,6 +142,41 @@ namespace cwg2126 { // cwg2126: 12
 #endif
 }
 
+namespace cwg2137 { // cwg2137: 19
+#if __cplusplus >= 201103L
+  struct Q {
+    Q();
+    Q(Q&&);
+    Q(std::initializer_list<Q>) = delete; // #cwg2137-Qcons
+  };
+
+  Q x = Q { Q() };
+  // since-cxx11-error at -1 {{call to deleted constructor of 'Q'}}
+  //   since-cxx11-note@#cwg2137-Qcons {{'Q' has been explicitly marked deleted here}}
+
+  int f(Q); // #cwg2137-f
+  int y = f({ Q() });
+  // since-cxx11-error at -1 {{call to deleted constructor of 'Q'}}
+  //   since-cxx11-note@#cwg2137-Qcons {{'Q' has been explicitly marked deleted here}}
+  //   since-cxx11-note@#cwg2137-f {{passing argument to parameter here}}
+
+  struct U {
+    U();
+    U(const U&);
+  };
+
+  struct Derived : U {
+    Derived();
+    Derived(const Derived&);
+  } d;
+
+  int g(Derived);
+  int g(U(&&)[1]) = delete;
+
+  int z = g({ d });
+#endif
+}
+
 namespace cwg2140 { // cwg2140: 9
 #if __cplusplus >= 201103L
   union U { int a; decltype(nullptr) b; };
diff --git a/clang/test/CXX/drs/cwg23xx.cpp b/clang/test/CXX/drs/cwg23xx.cpp
index e4a1e90941dbf..77fd6a337436e 100644
--- a/clang/test/CXX/drs/cwg23xx.cpp
+++ b/clang/test/CXX/drs/cwg23xx.cpp
@@ -6,6 +6,16 @@
 // RUN: %clang_cc1 -std=c++23 %s -verify=expected,since-cxx11,since-cxx14,since-cxx17,since-cxx20 -fexceptions -fcxx-exceptions -pedantic-errors 2>&1 | FileCheck %s
 // RUN: %clang_cc1 -std=c++2c %s -verify=expected,since-cxx11,since-cxx14,since-cxx17,since-cxx20 -fexceptions -fcxx-exceptions -pedantic-errors 2>&1 | FileCheck %s
 
+namespace std {
+  __extension__ typedef __SIZE_TYPE__ size_t;
+
+  template<typename E> struct initializer_list {
+    const E *p; size_t n;
+    initializer_list(const E *p, size_t n);
+    initializer_list();
+  };
+}
+
 #if __cplusplus >= 201103L
 namespace cwg2303 { // cwg2303: 12
 template <typename... T>
@@ -94,6 +104,95 @@ struct Z : W,
 // cwg2331: na
 // cwg2335 is in cwg2335.cxx
 
+namespace cwg2311 {  // cwg2311 is open with no proposed resolution
+#if __cplusplus >= 201707L
+template<typename T>
+void test() {
+  // Ensure none of these try to call a move constructor.
+  T a = T{T(0)};
+  T b{T(0)};
+  auto c{T(0)};
+  T d = {T(0)};
+  auto e = {T(0)};
+#if __cplusplus >= 202302L
+  auto f = auto{T(0)};
+#endif
+  void(*fn)(T);
+  fn({T(0)});
+}
+
+struct NonMovable {
+  NonMovable(int);
+  NonMovable(NonMovable&&) = delete;
+};
+struct NonMovableNonApplicableIList {
+  NonMovableNonApplicableIList(int);
+  NonMovableNonApplicableIList(NonMovableNonApplicableIList&&) = delete;
+  NonMovableNonApplicableIList(std::initializer_list<int>);
+};
+struct ExplicitMovable {
+  ExplicitMovable(int);
+  explicit ExplicitMovable(ExplicitMovable&&);
+};
+struct ExplicitNonMovable {
+  ExplicitNonMovable(int);
+  explicit ExplicitNonMovable(ExplicitNonMovable&&) = delete;
+};
+struct ExplicitNonMovableNonApplicableIList {
+  ExplicitNonMovableNonApplicableIList(int);
+  explicit ExplicitNonMovableNonApplicableIList(ExplicitNonMovableNonApplicableIList&&) = delete;
+  ExplicitNonMovableNonApplicableIList(std::initializer_list<int>);
+};
+struct CopyOnly {
+  CopyOnly(int);
+  CopyOnly(const CopyOnly&);
+  CopyOnly(CopyOnly&&) = delete;
+};
+struct ExplicitCopyOnly {
+  ExplicitCopyOnly(int);
+  explicit ExplicitCopyOnly(const ExplicitCopyOnly&);
+  explicit ExplicitCopyOnly(ExplicitCopyOnly&&) = delete;
+};
+
+template void test<NonMovable>();
+template void test<NonMovableNonApplicableIList>();
+template void test<ExplicitMovable>();
+template void test<ExplicitNonMovable>();
+template void test<ExplicitNonMovableNonApplicableIList>();
+template void test<CopyOnly>();
+template void test<ExplicitCopyOnly>();
+
+struct any {
+    template<typename T>
+    any(T&&);
+};
+
+template<typename T>
+struct X {
+    X();
+    X(T) = delete; // #cwg2311-X
+};
+
+X<std::initializer_list<any>> x{ X<std::initializer_list<any>>() };
+// since-cxx17-error at -1 {{call to deleted constructor of 'X<std::initializer_list<any>>'}}
+//   since-cxx17-note@#cwg2311-X {{'X' has been explicitly marked deleted here}}
+
+// Per the currently implemented resolution, this does not apply to std::initializer_list.
+// An initializer list initialized from `{ e }` always has exactly one element constructed
+// from `e`, where previously that could have been a copy of an init list or `e.operator std::initializer_list()`
+struct InitListCtor {
+  InitListCtor(int);
+  InitListCtor(InitListCtor&&) = delete;
+  InitListCtor(std::initializer_list<InitListCtor>) = delete; // #cwg2311-InitListCtor
+};
+
+std::initializer_list<InitListCtor> i;
+auto j = std::initializer_list<InitListCtor>{ i };
+// since-cxx17-error at -1 {{conversion function from 'std::initializer_list<InitListCtor>' to 'const cwg2311::InitListCtor' invokes a deleted function}}
+//   since-cxx17-note@#cwg2311-InitListCtor {{'InitListCtor' has been explicitly marked deleted here}}
+#endif
+}
+
 #if __cplusplus >= 201103L
 namespace cwg2338 { // cwg2338: 12
 namespace B {
diff --git a/clang/test/SemaCXX/cxx1z-class-template-argument-deduction.cpp b/clang/test/SemaCXX/cxx1z-class-template-argument-deduction.cpp
index 90404f115c75f..977cb1d6e16e2 100644
--- a/clang/test/SemaCXX/cxx1z-class-template-argument-deduction.cpp
+++ b/clang/test/SemaCXX/cxx1z-class-template-argument-deduction.cpp
@@ -19,13 +19,16 @@ template<typename T> constexpr bool has_type(T&) { return true; }
 
 std::initializer_list il1 = {1, 2, 3, 4, 5};
 auto il2 = std::initializer_list{1, 2, 3, 4};
-auto il3 = std::initializer_list{il1};
+auto il3 = std::initializer_list(il1);
 auto il4 = std::initializer_list{il1, il1, il1};
 static_assert(has_type<std::initializer_list<int>>(il1));
 static_assert(has_type<std::initializer_list<int>>(il2));
 static_assert(has_type<std::initializer_list<int>>(il3));
 static_assert(has_type<std::initializer_list<std::initializer_list<int>>>(il4));
 
+auto il5 = std::initializer_list{il1};
+// expected-error at -1 {{no viable conversion from 'std::initializer_list<int>' to 'const int'}}
+
 template<typename T> struct vector {
   template<typename Iter> vector(Iter, Iter);
   vector(std::initializer_list<T>);
diff --git a/clang/test/SemaCXX/single-element-init-list.cpp b/clang/test/SemaCXX/single-element-init-list.cpp
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000..bebd6f7ff3c42
--- /dev/null
+++ b/clang/test/SemaCXX/single-element-init-list.cpp
@@ -0,0 +1,81 @@
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -std=c++17 -fsyntax-only -verify %s
+
+// This is heavily affected by the speculative resolution applied to CWG2311
+// So behaviour shown here is subject to change.
+
+// expected-no-diagnostics
+
+namespace std {
+  typedef decltype(sizeof(int)) size_t;
+
+  // libc++'s implementation
+  template <class _E>
+  class initializer_list
+  {
+    const _E* __begin_;
+    size_t    __size_;
+
+    initializer_list(const _E* __b, size_t __s)
+      : __begin_(__b),
+        __size_(__s)
+    {}
+
+  public:
+    typedef _E        value_type;
+    typedef const _E& reference;
+    typedef const _E& const_reference;
+    typedef size_t    size_type;
+
+    typedef const _E* iterator;
+    typedef const _E* const_iterator;
+
+    constexpr initializer_list() : __begin_(nullptr), __size_(0) {}
+
+    constexpr size_t    size()  const {return __size_;}
+    const _E* begin() const {return __begin_;}
+    const _E* end()   const {return __begin_ + __size_;}
+  };
+
+  template<typename T>
+  struct vector {
+    size_t sz;
+    constexpr vector() : sz(0) {}
+    constexpr vector(initializer_list<T> ilist) : sz(ilist.size()) {}
+    constexpr vector(const vector& other) : sz(other.sz) {}
+    constexpr std::size_t size() const { return sz; }
+  };
+}
+
+// https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/77768#issuecomment-1908062472
+namespace Issue1 {
+  struct A {
+    constexpr A() {}
+  };
+
+  struct B {
+    int called_ctor;
+    constexpr explicit B(A) : called_ctor(0) {}
+    constexpr explicit B(std::vector<A>) : called_ctor(1) {}
+  };
+
+  struct C {
+    B b;
+    constexpr C() : b({A()}) {}
+  };
+
+  static_assert(C().b.called_ctor == 0);
+}
+
+// https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/77768#issuecomment-1957171805
+namespace Issue2 {
+  struct A {
+    constexpr A(int x_) {}
+    constexpr A(const std::vector<A>& a) {}
+  };
+
+  void f() {
+    constexpr std::vector<A> a{1,2};
+    constexpr std::vector<A> b{a};  // This should call the initializer_list constructor
+    static_assert(b.size() == 1);
+  }
+}
diff --git a/clang/www/cxx_dr_status.html b/clang/www/cxx_dr_status.html
index 4d94ac5a1ac1d..c1ca97cf8b5d2 100755
--- a/clang/www/cxx_dr_status.html
+++ b/clang/www/cxx_dr_status.html
@@ -12630,7 +12630,7 @@ <h2 id="cxxdr">C++ defect report implementation status</h2>
     <td><a href="https://cplusplus.github.io/CWG/issues/2137.html">2137</a></td>
     <td>CD4</td>
     <td>List-initialization from object of same type</td>
-    <td class="unknown" align="center">Unknown</td>
+    <td class="unreleased" align="center">Clang 19</td>
   </tr>
   <tr id="2138">
     <td><a href="https://cplusplus.github.io/CWG/issues/2138.html">2138</a></td>
diff --git a/libcxx/test/std/utilities/utility/pairs/pa...
[truncated]

``````````

</details>


https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/94355


More information about the libcxx-commits mailing list