[libcxx-commits] [libcxx] [libc++] Mark papers with no implementation changes required as "Nothing to do" (PR #99621)

[nicole mazzuca via libcxx-commits]

================
@@ -120,4 +120,4 @@
 "`P2614R2 <https://wg21.link/P2614R2>`__","LWG", "Deprecate ``numeric_limits::has_denorm``","February 2023","|Complete|","18.0",""
 "`P2588R3 <https://wg21.link/P2588R3>`__","LWG", "``barrier``’s phase completion guarantees","February 2023","","",""
 "`P2763R1 <https://wg21.link/P2763R1>`__","LWG", "``layout_stride`` static extents default constructor fix","February 2023","","",""
-"`P2736R2 <https://wg21.link/P2736R2>`__","CWG","Referencing The Unicode Standard","February 2023","","","|format|"
+"`P2736R2 <https://wg21.link/P2736R2>`__","CWG","Referencing The Unicode Standard","February 2023","Nothing to do","","|format|"
----------------
strega-nil wrote:

I would say no; the paper involved is not updating the unicode standard, just switching to referencing the unicode standard rather than ISO 10646.

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/99621