[libcxx-commits] [libcxx] [libc++][bit] Improves rotate functions. (PR #98032)
Mark de Wever via libcxx-commits
libcxx-commits at lists.llvm.org
Mon Jul 8 08:23:55 PDT 2024
https://github.com/mordante created https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/98032
Investigating #70719 shows our implementation was different from the Standard and could cause UB. Testing the codegen showed quite a bit of assembly generated for these functions. The functions have been written differently which allows Clang to optimize the code to use simple CPU rotate instructions.
Fixes: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/70719
>From 58b547b72d86add24206dd7714bc6fe0795b18ba Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Mark de Wever <koraq at xs4all.nl>
Date: Mon, 8 Jul 2024 17:18:06 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] [libc++][bit] Improves rotate functions.
Investigating #70719 shows our implementation was different from the
Standard and could cause UB. Testing the codegen showed quite a bit of
assembly generated for these functions. The functions have been written
differently which allows Clang to optimize the code to use simple CPU
rotate instructions.
Fixes: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/70719
---
libcxx/include/__bit/rotate.h | 37 +++++++++++++------
.../std/numerics/bit/bitops.rot/rotl.pass.cpp | 4 ++
.../std/numerics/bit/bitops.rot/rotr.pass.cpp | 4 ++
3 files changed, 33 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
diff --git a/libcxx/include/__bit/rotate.h b/libcxx/include/__bit/rotate.h
index d848056c3350d..845067f257da7 100644
--- a/libcxx/include/__bit/rotate.h
+++ b/libcxx/include/__bit/rotate.h
@@ -20,24 +20,37 @@
_LIBCPP_BEGIN_NAMESPACE_STD
+// Writing two full functions for rotl and rotr makes it easier for the compiler
+// to optimize the code. On x86 this function becomes the ROL instruction and
+// the rotr function becomes the ROR instruction.
template <class _Tp>
-_LIBCPP_HIDE_FROM_ABI _LIBCPP_CONSTEXPR_SINCE_CXX14 _Tp __rotr(_Tp __t, int __cnt) _NOEXCEPT {
- static_assert(__libcpp_is_unsigned_integer<_Tp>::value, "__rotr requires an unsigned integer type");
- const unsigned int __dig = numeric_limits<_Tp>::digits;
- if ((__cnt % __dig) == 0)
- return __t;
+_LIBCPP_HIDE_FROM_ABI _LIBCPP_CONSTEXPR_SINCE_CXX14 _Tp __rotl(_Tp __x, int __s) _NOEXCEPT {
+ static_assert(__libcpp_is_unsigned_integer<_Tp>::value, "__rotl requires an unsigned integer type");
+ const unsigned int __N = numeric_limits<_Tp>::digits;
+ int __r = __s % __N;
+
+ if (__r == 0)
+ return __x;
- if (__cnt < 0) {
- __cnt *= -1;
- return (__t << (__cnt % __dig)) | (__t >> (__dig - (__cnt % __dig))); // rotr with negative __cnt is similar to rotl
- }
+ if (__r > 0)
+ return (__x << __r) | (__x >> (__N - __r));
- return (__t >> (__cnt % __dig)) | (__t << (__dig - (__cnt % __dig)));
+ return (__x >> -__r) | (__x << (__N + __r));
}
template <class _Tp>
-_LIBCPP_HIDE_FROM_ABI _LIBCPP_CONSTEXPR_SINCE_CXX14 _Tp __rotl(_Tp __t, int __cnt) _NOEXCEPT {
- return std::__rotr(__t, -__cnt);
+_LIBCPP_HIDE_FROM_ABI _LIBCPP_CONSTEXPR_SINCE_CXX14 _Tp __rotr(_Tp __x, int __s) _NOEXCEPT {
+ static_assert(__libcpp_is_unsigned_integer<_Tp>::value, "__rotr requires an unsigned integer type");
+ const unsigned int __N = numeric_limits<_Tp>::digits;
+ int __r = __s % __N;
+
+ if (__r == 0)
+ return __x;
+
+ if (__r > 0)
+ return (__x >> __r) | (__x << (__N - __r));
+
+ return (__x << -__r) | (__x >> (__N + __r));
}
#if _LIBCPP_STD_VER >= 20
diff --git a/libcxx/test/std/numerics/bit/bitops.rot/rotl.pass.cpp b/libcxx/test/std/numerics/bit/bitops.rot/rotl.pass.cpp
index 50e498b5761e5..16eabbd2a5a4d 100644
--- a/libcxx/test/std/numerics/bit/bitops.rot/rotl.pass.cpp
+++ b/libcxx/test/std/numerics/bit/bitops.rot/rotl.pass.cpp
@@ -41,6 +41,8 @@ constexpr bool test()
assert(std::rotl(T(max - 1), 5) == T(max - 32));
assert(std::rotl(T(max - 1), 6) == T(max - 64));
assert(std::rotl(T(max - 1), 7) == T(max - 128));
+ assert(std::rotl(T(max - 1), std::numeric_limits<int>::max()) ==
+ std::rotl(T(max - 1), std::numeric_limits<int>::max() % std::numeric_limits<T>::digits));
assert(std::rotl(T(max - 1), -1) == T(max - highbit));
assert(std::rotl(T(max - 1), -2) == T(max - (highbit >> 1)));
@@ -49,6 +51,8 @@ constexpr bool test()
assert(std::rotl(T(max - 1), -5) == T(max - (highbit >> 4)));
assert(std::rotl(T(max - 1), -6) == T(max - (highbit >> 5)));
assert(std::rotl(T(max - 1), -7) == T(max - (highbit >> 6)));
+ assert(std::rotl(T(max - 1), std::numeric_limits<int>::min()) ==
+ std::rotl(T(max - 1), std::numeric_limits<int>::min() % std::numeric_limits<T>::digits));
assert(std::rotl(T(1), 0) == T(1));
assert(std::rotl(T(1), 1) == T(2));
diff --git a/libcxx/test/std/numerics/bit/bitops.rot/rotr.pass.cpp b/libcxx/test/std/numerics/bit/bitops.rot/rotr.pass.cpp
index 00c9e617d2edf..53405588266f7 100644
--- a/libcxx/test/std/numerics/bit/bitops.rot/rotr.pass.cpp
+++ b/libcxx/test/std/numerics/bit/bitops.rot/rotr.pass.cpp
@@ -41,6 +41,8 @@ constexpr bool test()
assert(std::rotr(T(max - 1), 5) == T(max - (highbit >> 4)));
assert(std::rotr(T(max - 1), 6) == T(max - (highbit >> 5)));
assert(std::rotr(T(max - 1), 7) == T(max - (highbit >> 6)));
+ assert(std::rotr(T(max - 1), std::numeric_limits<int>::max()) ==
+ std::rotr(T(max - 1), std::numeric_limits<int>::max() % std::numeric_limits<T>::digits));
assert(std::rotr(T(max - 1), -1) == T(max - 2));
assert(std::rotr(T(max - 1), -2) == T(max - 4));
@@ -49,6 +51,8 @@ constexpr bool test()
assert(std::rotr(T(max - 1), -5) == T(max - 32));
assert(std::rotr(T(max - 1), -6) == T(max - 64));
assert(std::rotr(T(max - 1), -7) == T(max - 128));
+ assert(std::rotr(T(max - 1), std::numeric_limits<int>::min()) ==
+ std::rotr(T(max - 1), std::numeric_limits<int>::min() % std::numeric_limits<T>::digits));
assert(std::rotr(T(128), 0) == T(128));
assert(std::rotr(T(128), 1) == T(64));
More information about the libcxx-commits
mailing list