[libcxx-commits] [libcxx] [libc++][hardening] Categorize more assertions. (PR #75918)

[Konstantin Varlamov via libcxx-commits]

================
@@ -132,13 +132,13 @@ __base_10_u64(char* __buffer, uint64_t __value) noexcept {
 /// range that can be used. However the range is sufficient for
 /// \ref __base_10_u128.
 _LIBCPP_CONSTEXPR_SINCE_CXX23 _LIBCPP_HIDE_FROM_ABI inline __uint128_t __pow_10(int __exp) noexcept {
-  _LIBCPP_ASSERT_UNCATEGORIZED(__exp >= __pow10_128_offset, "Index out of bounds");
+  _LIBCPP_ASSERT_INTERNAL(__exp >= __pow10_128_offset, "Index out of bounds");
   return __pow10_128[__exp - __pow10_128_offset];
 }
 
 _LIBCPP_CONSTEXPR_SINCE_CXX23 _LIBCPP_HIDE_FROM_ABI inline char*
 __base_10_u128(char* __buffer, __uint128_t __value) noexcept {
-  _LIBCPP_ASSERT_UNCATEGORIZED(
+  _LIBCPP_ASSERT_INTERNAL(
       __value > numeric_limits<uint64_t>::max(), "The optimizations for this algorithm fail when this isn't true.");
----------------
var-const wrote:

Hmm, I think the current state is right (_The optimizations... fail_) since _optimizations_ is plural. Perhaps I'm misreading it?

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/75918