[libcxx-commits] [libcxx] [libc++] Refactor the predicate taking variant of `__cxx_atomic_wait` (PR #80596)
Louis Dionne via libcxx-commits
libcxx-commits at lists.llvm.org
Fri Feb 16 06:42:36 PST 2024
Jan =?utf-8?q?Kokemüller?= <jan.kokemueller at gmail.com>,
Jan =?utf-8?q?Kokemüller?= <jan.kokemueller at gmail.com>,
Jan =?utf-8?q?Kokemüller?= <jan.kokemueller at gmail.com>,
Jan =?utf-8?q?Kokemüller?= <jan.kokemueller at gmail.com>
Message-ID:
In-Reply-To: <llvm.org/llvm/llvm-project/pull/80596 at github.com>
================
@@ -178,6 +178,7 @@ _LIBCPP_EXPORTED_FROM_ABI void __cxx_atomic_notify_one(__cxx_atomic_contention_t
_LIBCPP_EXPORTED_FROM_ABI void __cxx_atomic_notify_all(__cxx_atomic_contention_t const volatile* __location) {
__libcpp_contention_notify(&__libcpp_contention_state(__location)->__contention_state, __location, false);
}
+// This function is never used, but still exported for ABI compatibility.
----------------
ldionne wrote:
Is this because this is handled by `__poll_or_get_monitor` now?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/80596
More information about the libcxx-commits
mailing list