[libcxx-commits] [libcxx] [SystemZ][z/OS][libcxx] mark aligned allocation tests UNSUPPORTED on z/OS (PR #80735)

Mark de Wever via libcxx-commits libcxx-commits at lists.llvm.org
Mon Feb 12 10:14:38 PST 2024


================
@@ -9,6 +9,10 @@
 // UNSUPPORTED: no-exceptions
 // UNSUPPORTED: sanitizer-new-delete
 
+// Libc++ when built for z/OS doesn't contain the aligned allocation functions,
+// nor does the dynamic library shipped with z/OS.
+// UNSUPPORTED: target={{.+}}-zos{{.*}}
----------------
mordante wrote:

I agree with consistency, both for z/OS and our generic way. Grepping for `XFAIL:.*target=` has 101 hits, `UNSUPPORTED:.*target=` 44 hits where 25 are due to zos. 
Could you make a separate review for the existing `UNSUPPORTED` -> `XFAIL` changes? Feel free to assign that patch to me. If you can assign, please leave a link in this review.

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/80735


More information about the libcxx-commits mailing list