[libcxx-commits] [libcxx] Fix typeinfo for undefined sanitizer (PR #121228)
via libcxx-commits
libcxx-commits at lists.llvm.org
Fri Dec 27 14:58:08 PST 2024
github-actions[bot] wrote:
<!--LLVM CODE FORMAT COMMENT: {clang-format}-->
:warning: C/C++ code formatter, clang-format found issues in your code. :warning:
<details>
<summary>
You can test this locally with the following command:
</summary>
``````````bash
git-clang-format --diff 815343e7dd32cc4c5c903ac52daf87aaa4e4cd6e 3d8fb18949dba038667e6d8983948b85a73cefdb --extensions -- libcxx/include/typeinfo
``````````
</details>
<details>
<summary>
View the diff from clang-format here.
</summary>
``````````diff
diff --git a/libcxx/include/typeinfo b/libcxx/include/typeinfo
index a900ccaf7e..6bca852e21 100644
--- a/libcxx/include/typeinfo
+++ b/libcxx/include/typeinfo
@@ -316,7 +316,8 @@ public:
_LIBCPP_HIDE_FROM_ABI size_t hash_code() const _NOEXCEPT { return __impl::__hash(__type_name); }
// We need to inline this code because otherwise we will get a stack overflow with undefined sanitizer.
- _LIBCPP_HIDE_FROM_ABI _LIBCPP_ALWAYS_INLINE _LIBCPP_CONSTEXPR_SINCE_CXX23 bool operator==(const type_info& __arg) const _NOEXCEPT {
+ _LIBCPP_HIDE_FROM_ABI _LIBCPP_ALWAYS_INLINE _LIBCPP_CONSTEXPR_SINCE_CXX23 bool
+ operator==(const type_info& __arg) const _NOEXCEPT {
// When evaluated in a constant expression, both type infos simply can't come
// from different translation units, so it is sufficient to compare their addresses.
if (__libcpp_is_constant_evaluated()) {
``````````
</details>
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/121228
More information about the libcxx-commits
mailing list