[libcxx-commits] [libcxx] [libc++] Add an ABI setting to harden unique_ptr<T[]>::operator[] (PR #91798)

[Eli Friedman via libcxx-commits]

================
@@ -0,0 +1,55 @@
+// -*- C++ -*-
+//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
+//
+// Part of the LLVM Project, under the Apache License v2.0 with LLVM Exceptions.
+// See https://llvm.org/LICENSE.txt for license information.
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: Apache-2.0 WITH LLVM-exception
+//
+//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
+
+#ifndef _LIBCPP___MEMORY_ARRAY_COOKIE_H
+#define _LIBCPP___MEMORY_ARRAY_COOKIE_H
+
+#include <__config>
+
+#include <__configuration/abi.h>
+#include <__type_traits/integral_constant.h>
+#include <__type_traits/is_trivially_destructible.h>
+#include <__type_traits/negation.h>
+#include <cstddef>
+
+#if !defined(_LIBCPP_HAS_NO_PRAGMA_SYSTEM_HEADER)
+#  pragma GCC system_header
+#endif
+
+_LIBCPP_BEGIN_NAMESPACE_STD
+
+// Trait representing whether a type requires an array cookie at the start of its allocation when
+// allocated as `new T[n]` and deallocated as `delete array`.
+//
+// Under the Itanium C++ ABI [1], we know that an array cookie is available unless `T` is trivially
+// destructible and the call to `operator delete[]` is not a sized operator delete. Under ABIs other
+// than the Itanium ABI, we assume there are no array cookies.
+//
+// [1]: https://itanium-cxx-abi.github.io/cxx-abi/abi.html#array-cookies
+#ifdef _LIBCPP_ABI_ITANIUM
+// TODO: Use a builtin instead
+// TODO: We should factor in the choice of the usual deallocation function in this determination.
+template <class _Tp>
+struct __has_array_cookie : _Not<is_trivially_destructible<_Tp> > {};
----------------
efriedma-quic wrote:

This seems reasonable for now.

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/91798