[libcxx-commits] [libcxx] [libcxx] P2278R4: implement `{basic_, }const_iterator`, and have `cbegin` et. al. return it (PR #99915)

[Louis Dionne via libcxx-commits]

================
@@ -219,9 +219,9 @@
 "`LWG3761 <https://wg21.link/LWG3761>`__","``cartesian_product_view::iterator::operator-`` should pass by reference","2022-11 (Kona)","","",""
 "`LWG3762 <https://wg21.link/LWG3762>`__","``generator::iterator::operator==`` should pass by reference","2022-11 (Kona)","","",""
 "`LWG3764 <https://wg21.link/LWG3764>`__","``reference_wrapper::operator()`` should propagate noexcept","2022-11 (Kona)","|Complete|","17.0",""
-"`LWG3765 <https://wg21.link/LWG3765>`__","``const_sentinel`` should be constrained","2022-11 (Kona)","","",""
-"`LWG3766 <https://wg21.link/LWG3766>`__","``view_interface::cbegin`` is underconstrained","2022-11 (Kona)","","",""
-"`LWG3770 <https://wg21.link/LWG3770>`__","``const_sentinel_t`` is missing","2022-11 (Kona)","","",""
+"`LWG3765 <https://wg21.link/LWG3765>`__","``const_sentinel`` should be constrained","2022-11 (Kona)","|Complete|","20.0",""
----------------
ldionne wrote:

Could you confirm that you've gone through these LWG issues and made sure that we have test coverage for each of them? For example, I would expect a test that uses `basic_const_iterator<volatile int*>::operator->` to guard against LWG3853.

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/99915