[libcxx-commits] [libcxx] [libc++] Fix UB in <expected> related to "has value" flag (#68552) (PR #68733)
Jan Kokemüller via libcxx-commits
libcxx-commits at lists.llvm.org
Fri Oct 27 13:07:53 PDT 2023
================
@@ -43,6 +45,36 @@ constexpr bool test() {
assert(!e.has_value());
}
+ // The following tests check that the "has_value" flag is not overwritten
+ // by the constructor of the value. This could happen because the flag is
+ // stored in the tail padding of the value.
+ //
+ // The first test is a simplified version of the real code where this was
+ // first observed.
+ //
+ // The other tests use a synthetic struct that clobbers its tail padding
+ // on construction, making the issue easier to reproduce.
+ //
+ // See https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/68552 and the linked PR.
+ {
+ auto f1 = [] -> std::expected<std::optional<int>, long> { return 0; };
+
+ auto f2 = [&f1] -> std::expected<std::optional<int>, int> {
+ return f1().transform_error([](auto) { return 0; });
+ };
+
+ auto e = f2();
+ assert(e.has_value());
+ }
+ {
+ const std::expected<TailClobberer<0>, bool> e = {};
+ // clang-cl does not support [[no_unique_address]] yet.
+#if !(defined(TEST_COMPILER_CLANG) && defined(_MSC_VER))
+ static_assert(sizeof(TailClobberer<0>) == sizeof(e));
+#endif
----------------
jiixyj wrote:
Done!
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/68733
More information about the libcxx-commits
mailing list