[libcxx-commits] [libcxx] [libc++] Fix inconsistency between is_lock_free and is_always_lock_free (PR #68109)

[via libcxx-commits]

https://github.com/phyBrackets commented:

Wow, thanks for noticing the inconsistency, fix looks good to me, as `is_lock_free` now correctly  considering padding introduced by _Atomic(T).

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/68109