[libcxx-commits] [libcxx] [libc++][memory] P1132R8: out_ptr - a scalable output pointer abstraction (PR #73618)
Louis Dionne via libcxx-commits
libcxx-commits at lists.llvm.org
Tue Nov 28 07:54:19 PST 2023
================
@@ -0,0 +1,97 @@
+// -*- C++ -*-
+//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
+//
+// Part of the LLVM Project, under the Apache License v2.0 with LLVM Exceptions.
+// See https://llvm.org/LICENSE.txt for license information.
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: Apache-2.0 WITH LLVM-exception
+//
+//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
+
+#ifndef _LIBCPP___OUT_PTR_H
+#define _LIBCPP___OUT_PTR_H
+
+#include <__config>
+#include <__memory/addressof.h>
+#include <__memory/pointer_traits.h>
+#include <__memory/shared_ptr.h>
+#include <__memory/unique_ptr.h>
+#include <__type_traits/is_specialization.h>
+#include <__type_traits/is_void.h>
+#include <tuple>
+
+#if !defined(_LIBCPP_HAS_NO_PRAGMA_SYSTEM_HEADER)
+# pragma GCC system_header
+#endif
+
+_LIBCPP_BEGIN_NAMESPACE_STD
+
+#if _LIBCPP_STD_VER >= 23
+
+template <class _Tp>
+concept __resettable_adapted_ptr = requires(_Tp __ptr) { __ptr().reset(); };
+
+template <class _Smart, class _Pointer, class... _Args>
+class _LIBCPP_TEMPLATE_VIS out_ptr_t {
+ static_assert(!__is_specialization_v<_Smart, shared_ptr> || sizeof...(_Args) > 0,
+ "Specialization of std::shared_ptr<> requires a deleter.");
+
+public:
+ _LIBCPP_HIDE_FROM_ABI explicit out_ptr_t(_Smart& __s, _Args... __args)
+ : __s_(__s), __a_(std::forward<_Args>(__args)...), __p_() {
+ using _Ptr = decltype(__s);
+ if constexpr (__resettable_smart_pointer<_Ptr>) {
+ __s_.reset();
+ } else if constexpr (is_constructible_v<_Smart>) {
+ __s_ = _Smart();
+ } else {
+ static_assert(__resettable_smart_pointer<_Ptr> || is_constructible_v<_Smart>);
+ }
+ }
+
+ _LIBCPP_HIDE_FROM_ABI out_ptr_t(const out_ptr_t&) = delete;
+
+ _LIBCPP_HIDE_FROM_ABI ~out_ptr_t() {
+ if (!__p_) {
+ return;
+ }
+
+ using _SP = __pointer_of_or_t<_Smart, _Pointer>;
+ if constexpr (__resettable_smart_pointer_with_args<_Smart, _Pointer, _Args...>) {
+ std::apply([&](auto&&... __args) { __s_.reset(static_cast<_SP>(__p_), std::forward<_Args>(__args)...); },
+ std::move(__a_));
+ } else if constexpr (is_constructible_v<_Smart, _SP, _Args...>) {
+ std::apply([&](auto&&... __args) { __s_ = _Smart(static_cast<_SP>(__p_), std::forward<_Args>(__args)...); },
+ std::move(__a_));
+ } else {
+ static_assert(__resettable_smart_pointer_with_args<_Smart, _Pointer, _Args...> ||
+ is_constructible_v<_Smart, _SP, _Args...>);
+ }
+ }
+
+ _LIBCPP_HIDE_FROM_ABI operator _Pointer*() const noexcept { return std::addressof(const_cast<_Pointer&>(__p_)); }
+
+ _LIBCPP_HIDE_FROM_ABI operator void**() const noexcept
+ requires(!is_same_v<_Pointer, void*>)
+ {
+ static_assert(is_pointer_v<_Pointer>);
+
+ return reinterpret_cast<void**>(static_cast<_Pointer*>(*this));
+ }
+
+private:
+ _Smart& __s_;
+ tuple<_Args...> __a_;
+ _Pointer __p_ = _Pointer();
+};
+
+template <class _Pointer = void, class _Smart, class... _Args>
+_LIBCPP_HIDE_FROM_ABI auto out_ptr(_Smart& __s, _Args&&... __args) {
+ using _Ptr = conditional_t<is_void_v<_Pointer>, __pointer_of_t<_Smart>, _Pointer>;
+ return std::out_ptr_t<_Smart, _Ptr, _Args&&...>{__s, std::forward<_Args>(__args)...};
----------------
ldionne wrote:
The wording uses `out_ptr_t<...>(...)` instead of `out_ptr_t<...>{...}` -- let's stick with that just for consistency.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/73618
More information about the libcxx-commits
mailing list