[libcxx-commits] [libcxx] [libc++][NFC] Use __construct_at and __destroy_at instead of using preprocessor conditionals (PR #70866)

via libcxx-commits libcxx-commits at lists.llvm.org
Mon Nov 27 07:54:52 PST 2023

Previous message: [libcxx-commits] [libcxx] [libc++][NFC] Use __construct_at and __destroy_at instead of using preprocessor conditionals (PR #70866)
Next message: [libcxx-commits] [libcxx] ba89749 - [libc++] <experimental/simd> Add implicit type conversion constructor for class simd/simd_mask (#71132)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

EricWF wrote:

What does "constexpr friendlyness" mean?
Is there magic in `construct_at`? 

Because it's just placement new.

If this adds constexpr friendlyness then doesn't in need more tests?

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/70866

Previous message: [libcxx-commits] [libcxx] [libc++][NFC] Use __construct_at and __destroy_at instead of using preprocessor conditionals (PR #70866)
Next message: [libcxx-commits] [libcxx] ba89749 - [libc++] <experimental/simd> Add implicit type conversion constructor for class simd/simd_mask (#71132)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

More information about the libcxx-commits mailing list