[libcxx-commits] [libcxx] [libcxx][docs] Make test name pattern documentation more obvious (PR #73136)

Will Hawkins via libcxx-commits libcxx-commits at lists.llvm.org
Mon Nov 27 06:20:07 PST 2023


https://github.com/hawkinsw updated https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/73136

>From b46ef9e42a525433eeb3959b0c92468120e63ae4 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Will Hawkins <hawkinsw at obs.cr>
Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2023 10:12:04 -0500
Subject: [PATCH 1/4] [libcxx][docs] Make test name pattern documentation more
 obvious

As a new contributor, I found it hard to find the documentation for the
meaning of the names of different tests and how those names translate
to Lit.

This makes that documentation more explicit.
---
 libcxx/docs/TestingLibcxx.rst | 49 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
 1 file changed, 42 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/libcxx/docs/TestingLibcxx.rst b/libcxx/docs/TestingLibcxx.rst
index 44f3904f4e426a0..5783cc6a21922cc 100644
--- a/libcxx/docs/TestingLibcxx.rst
+++ b/libcxx/docs/TestingLibcxx.rst
@@ -330,13 +330,48 @@ additional headers.
           taken to make it work in earlier language versions.
 
 
-Additional reading
-------------------
-
-The function ``CxxStandardLibraryTest`` in the file
-``libcxx/utils/libcxx/test/format.py`` has documentation about writing test. It
-explains the difference between the test named  ``foo.pass.cpp`` and named
-``foo.verify.cpp`` are.
+Test names
+----------
+
+The names of test files have meaning for the libcxx-specific configuration of 
+Lit. A complete description can be found in the docstring for the function 
+``CxxStandardLibraryTest`` in the file ``libcxx/utils/libcxx/test/format.py``.
+
+For quick reference, here is an overview of some of the most useful patterns:
+
+.. list-table:: Lit Meaning of libcxx Test Filenames
+   :widths: 25 75
+   :header-rows: 1
+
+   * - Name Pattern
+     - Meaning
+   * - ``FOO.pass.cpp``
+     - Compiles, links and runs successfully
+   * - ``FOO.pass.mm``
+     - Same as ``FOO.pass.cpp``, but for Objective-C++
+
+   * - ``FOO.compile.pass.cpp``
+     - Compiles successfully, link and run not attempted
+   * - ``FOO.compile.pass.mm``
+     - Same as ``FOO.compile.pass.cpp``, but for Objective-C++
+   * - ``FOO.compile.fail.cpp``
+     - Does not compile successfully
+
+   * - ``FOO.link.pass.cpp``
+     - Compiles and links successfully, run not attempted
+   * - ``FOO.link.pass.mm``
+     - Same as ``FOO.link.pass.cpp``, but for Objective-C++
+   * - ``FOO.link.fail.cpp``
+     - Compiles successfully, but fails to link
+
+   * - ``FOO.sh.<anything>``
+     - A builtin Lit Shell test
+
+   * - ``FOO.gen.<anything>``
+     - A ``.sh`` test that generates one or more Lit tests on the fly. Executing this test must generate one or more files as expected by LLVM split-file, and each generated file leads to a separate Lit test that runs that file as defined by the test format. This can be used to generate multiple Lit tests from a single source file, which is useful for testing repetitive properties in the library.  Be careful not to abuse this since this is not a replacement for usual code reuse techniques.
+
+   * - ``FOO.verify.cpp``
+     - Compiles with clang-verify. This type of test is automatically marked as UNSUPPORTED if the compiler does not support clang-verify.
 
 Benchmarks
 ==========

>From c148c822407d5ee402364a88dd55bb503fa1b67c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Will Hawkins <hawkinsw at obs.cr>
Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2023 21:21:02 -0500
Subject: [PATCH 2/4] fixup! [libcxx][docs] Make test name pattern
 documentation more obvious

Update to consolidate lit test file name pattern semantic documentation to docs/
---
 libcxx/utils/libcxx/test/format.py | 36 ++++--------------------------
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 32 deletions(-)

diff --git a/libcxx/utils/libcxx/test/format.py b/libcxx/utils/libcxx/test/format.py
index 52c6f9cd8f2ef22..dc5291a62464aad 100644
--- a/libcxx/utils/libcxx/test/format.py
+++ b/libcxx/utils/libcxx/test/format.py
@@ -155,38 +155,10 @@ class CxxStandardLibraryTest(lit.formats.FileBasedTest):
     """
     Lit test format for the C++ Standard Library conformance test suite.
 
-    This test format is based on top of the ShTest format -- it basically
-    creates a shell script performing the right operations (compile/link/run)
-    based on the extension of the test file it encounters. It supports files
-    with the following extensions:
-
-    FOO.pass.cpp            - Compiles, links and runs successfully
-    FOO.pass.mm             - Same as .pass.cpp, but for Objective-C++
-
-    FOO.compile.pass.cpp    - Compiles successfully, link and run not attempted
-    FOO.compile.pass.mm     - Same as .compile.pass.cpp, but for Objective-C++
-    FOO.compile.fail.cpp    - Does not compile successfully
-
-    FOO.link.pass.cpp       - Compiles and links successfully, run not attempted
-    FOO.link.pass.mm        - Same as .link.pass.cpp, but for Objective-C++
-    FOO.link.fail.cpp       - Compiles successfully, but fails to link
-
-    FOO.sh.<anything>       - A builtin Lit Shell test
-
-    FOO.gen.<anything>      - A .sh test that generates one or more Lit tests on the
-                              fly. Executing this test must generate one or more files
-                              as expected by LLVM split-file, and each generated file
-                              leads to a separate Lit test that runs that file as
-                              defined by the test format. This can be used to generate
-                              multiple Lit tests from a single source file, which is
-                              useful for testing repetitive properties in the library.
-                              Be careful not to abuse this since this is not a replacement
-                              for usual code reuse techniques.
-
-    FOO.verify.cpp          - Compiles with clang-verify. This type of test is
-                              automatically marked as UNSUPPORTED if the compiler
-                              does not support Clang-verify.
-
+    Lit tests are contained in files that follow a certain pattern. That
+    pattern determines the semantics of the test. See
+    libcxx/docs/TestingLibcxx.rst or https://libcxx.llvm.org/TestingLibcxx.html
+    for a complete description of those semantics.
 
     Substitution requirements
     ===============================

>From 039de0768842ec9dad0870f731885e6e7770c2bf Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Will Hawkins <hawkinsw at obs.cr>
Date: Mon, 27 Nov 2023 09:15:47 -0500
Subject: [PATCH 3/4] fixup! [libcxx][docs] Make test name pattern
 documentation more obvious

(Fully) centralize all naming documentation in the rst-based documentation.
---
 libcxx/docs/TestingLibcxx.rst | 41 ++++++++++++++++++++---------------
 1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)

diff --git a/libcxx/docs/TestingLibcxx.rst b/libcxx/docs/TestingLibcxx.rst
index 5783cc6a21922cc..b93f61388cda6c6 100644
--- a/libcxx/docs/TestingLibcxx.rst
+++ b/libcxx/docs/TestingLibcxx.rst
@@ -334,11 +334,12 @@ Test names
 ----------
 
 The names of test files have meaning for the libcxx-specific configuration of 
-Lit. A complete description can be found in the docstring for the function 
-``CxxStandardLibraryTest`` in the file ``libcxx/utils/libcxx/test/format.py``.
-
-For quick reference, here is an overview of some of the most useful patterns:
+Lit. Based on the pattern that matches the name of a test file, Lit will test
+the code contained therein in different ways. Refer to the `Lit Meaning of libcxx
+Test Filenames`_ when
+determining the names for new test files.
 
+.. _Lit Meaning of libcxx Test Filenames:
 .. list-table:: Lit Meaning of libcxx Test Filenames
    :widths: 25 75
    :header-rows: 1
@@ -346,32 +347,36 @@ For quick reference, here is an overview of some of the most useful patterns:
    * - Name Pattern
      - Meaning
    * - ``FOO.pass.cpp``
-     - Compiles, links and runs successfully
+     - Checks whether the C++ code in the file compiles, links and runs successfully.
    * - ``FOO.pass.mm``
-     - Same as ``FOO.pass.cpp``, but for Objective-C++
+     - Same as ``FOO.pass.cpp``, but for Objective-C++.
 
    * - ``FOO.compile.pass.cpp``
-     - Compiles successfully, link and run not attempted
+     - Checks whether the C++ code in the file compiles successfully.
    * - ``FOO.compile.pass.mm``
-     - Same as ``FOO.compile.pass.cpp``, but for Objective-C++
+     - Same as ``FOO.compile.pass.cpp``, but for Objective-C++.
    * - ``FOO.compile.fail.cpp``
-     - Does not compile successfully
+     - Checks that the code in the file does *not* compile successfully.
+
+   * - ``FOO.verify.cpp``
+     - Compiles with clang-verify. This type of test is automatically marked as UNSUPPORTED if the compiler does not support clang-verify.
 
    * - ``FOO.link.pass.cpp``
-     - Compiles and links successfully, run not attempted
+     - Checks that the C++ code in the file compiles and links successfully -- no run attempted.
    * - ``FOO.link.pass.mm``
-     - Same as ``FOO.link.pass.cpp``, but for Objective-C++
+     - Same as ``FOO.link.pass.cpp``, but for Objective-C++.
    * - ``FOO.link.fail.cpp``
-     - Compiles successfully, but fails to link
+     - Checks whether the C++ code in the file fails to link after successful compilation.
+   * - ``FOO.link.fail.mm``
+     - Same as ``FOO.link.fail.cpp``, but for Objective-C++.
 
    * - ``FOO.sh.<anything>``
-     - A builtin Lit Shell test
-
+     - A *builtin Lit Shell* test.
    * - ``FOO.gen.<anything>``
-     - A ``.sh`` test that generates one or more Lit tests on the fly. Executing this test must generate one or more files as expected by LLVM split-file, and each generated file leads to a separate Lit test that runs that file as defined by the test format. This can be used to generate multiple Lit tests from a single source file, which is useful for testing repetitive properties in the library.  Be careful not to abuse this since this is not a replacement for usual code reuse techniques.
-
-   * - ``FOO.verify.cpp``
-     - Compiles with clang-verify. This type of test is automatically marked as UNSUPPORTED if the compiler does not support clang-verify.
+     - A *builtin Lit Shell* test that generates one or more Lit tests on the fly. Executing this test must generate one or more files as expected
+       by LLVM split-file. Each generated file will drive an invocation of a separate Lit test. The format of the generated file will determine the type
+       of Lit test to be executed. This can be used to generate multiple Lit tests from a single source file, which is useful for testing repetitive properties
+       in the library. Be careful not to abuse this since this is not a replacement for usual code reuse techniques.
 
 Benchmarks
 ==========

>From 3c1297b30674c8854a0a1ae7b7e0d11f384ec391 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Will Hawkins <hawkinsw at obs.cr>
Date: Mon, 27 Nov 2023 09:19:29 -0500
Subject: [PATCH 4/4] fixup! [libcxx][docs] Make test name pattern
 documentation more obvious

Point only to www documentation for test names (per @mordante's excellent feedback)
---
 libcxx/utils/libcxx/test/format.py | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/libcxx/utils/libcxx/test/format.py b/libcxx/utils/libcxx/test/format.py
index dc5291a62464aad..cd4807f1855738d 100644
--- a/libcxx/utils/libcxx/test/format.py
+++ b/libcxx/utils/libcxx/test/format.py
@@ -157,7 +157,7 @@ class CxxStandardLibraryTest(lit.formats.FileBasedTest):
 
     Lit tests are contained in files that follow a certain pattern. That
     pattern determines the semantics of the test. See
-    libcxx/docs/TestingLibcxx.rst or https://libcxx.llvm.org/TestingLibcxx.html
+    https://libcxx.llvm.org/TestingLibcxx.html#test-names
     for a complete description of those semantics.
 
     Substitution requirements



More information about the libcxx-commits mailing list