[libcxx-commits] [PATCH] D144394: [libc++] Forward to std::{, w}memchr in std::find
Nikolas Klauser via Phabricator via libcxx-commits
libcxx-commits at lists.llvm.org
Wed May 10 16:15:23 PDT 2023
philnik added inline comments.
================
Comment at: libcxx/include/cwchar:248-249
+
+ return reinterpret_cast<_Tp*>(
+ std::wmemchr(reinterpret_cast<__apply_cv<_Tp, wchar_t>::type*>(__str), __char, __count));
}
----------------
ldionne wrote:
> For the non-constexpr case, I would do this to make sure that we really never exploit any UB, even if it may seem to be benign right now:
>
> ```
> if constexpr (std::is_trivial_v<_Tp>) { // we know it's safe to reinterpret cast (at least in C++20 with implicit lifetime types)
> return reinterpret_cast<_Tp*>(std::wmemchr(reinterpret_cast<__apply_cv<_Tp, wchar_t>::type*>(__str), __char, __count));
> } else {
> // loop
> }
> ```
>
> Concretely, this won't change anything since we already only call this function with integral types, however if we were to e.g. specialize `__is_trivially_equality_comparable` for a non-trivial type, then my suggested code would work whereas the original code might be (benign) UB. WDYT?
I went for the "only optimize if we have `__builtin_wmemchr`" option instead. IMO we should try to apply this optimization as broadly as possible, and we can at least heavily influence how clang optimizes `__builtin_wmemchr`. This means that GCC won't optimize this as well, but I think this is OK given that by far most libc++ users use clang.
Repository:
rG LLVM Github Monorepo
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D144394/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D144394
More information about the libcxx-commits
mailing list