[libcxx-commits] [PATCH] D143845: [libc++][doc] Adds Issaquah papers and issues.

[Mark de Wever via Phabricator via libcxx-commits]

Mordante marked an inline comment as done.
Mordante added a comment.

Thanks for the reviews!



================
Comment at: libcxx/docs/Status/Cxx2bIssues.csv:279
+"`3867 <https://wg21.link/LWG3867>`__","Should ``std::basic_osyncstream``'s move assignment operator be ``noexcept``?","February 2023","","",""
+"`3441 <https://wg21.link/LWG3441>`__","Misleading note about calls to customization points","February 2023","","",""
+"`3622 <https://wg21.link/LWG3622>`__","Misspecified transitivity of equivalence in §[unord.req.general]","February 2023","","",""
----------------
var-const wrote:
> I think we can mark this one as "Nothing to do" (in this patch or a follow-up), AFAICS it doesn't affect the implementation.
I had a look at the issue and see only removals. I still think it's good to validate whether these lessened restrictions are something we can/want to take advantage of in libc++. Since this is not my area of expertise I prefer to leave it open so a you or another ranges expert can decide whether or not to close it with nothing to do.


Repository:
  rG LLVM Github Monorepo

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D143845/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D143845