[libcxx-commits] [libcxx] [ASan][libc++] Annotating `std::basic_string` with all allocators (PR #75845)

[via libcxx-commits]

================
@@ -0,0 +1,78 @@
+//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
+//
+// Part of the LLVM Project, under the Apache License v2.0 with LLVM Exceptions.
+// See https://llvm.org/LICENSE.txt for license information.
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: Apache-2.0 WITH LLVM-exception
+//
+//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
+
+// REQUIRES: asan
+// UNSUPPORTED: c++03
+
+// <string>
+
+// Test based on: https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=1419798#c5
+// Some allocators during deallocation may not call destructors and just reuse memory.
+// In those situations, one may want to deactivate annotations for a specific allocator.
+// It's possible with __asan_annotate_container_with_allocator template class.
+// This test confirms that those allocators work after turning off annotations.
+
+#include <assert.h>
+#include <stdlib.h>
+#include <string>
+#include <new>
+
+struct reuse_allocator {
+  static size_t const N = 100;
+  reuse_allocator() {
+    for (size_t i = 0; i < N; ++i)
+      __buffers[i] = malloc(8 * 1024);
+  }
+  ~reuse_allocator() {
+    for (size_t i = 0; i < N; ++i)
+      free(__buffers[i]);
+  }
+  void* alloc() {
+    assert(__next_id < N);
+    return __buffers[__next_id++];
+  }
+  void reset() { __next_id = 0; }
+  void* __buffers[N];
+  size_t __next_id = 0;
+} reuse_buffers;
+
+template <typename T>
+struct user_allocator {
+  using value_type = T;
+  user_allocator() = default;
+  template <class U>
+  user_allocator(user_allocator<U>) {}
+  friend bool operator==(user_allocator, user_allocator) { return true; }
+  friend bool operator!=(user_allocator x, user_allocator y) { return !(x == y); }
+
+  T* allocate(size_t) { return (T*)reuse_buffers.alloc(); }
+  void deallocate(T*, size_t) noexcept {}
+};
+
+template <class T>
+struct std::__asan_annotate_container_with_allocator<user_allocator<T>> {
----------------
EricWF wrote:

Are you aware of any users of it?

I'm not saying it doesn't work, I'm saying it works by encouraging bad practice. 

But if these are the cases we're protecting against, this is all moot. We shouldn't support those cases.


https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/75845