[libcxx-commits] [libcxx] cf07b88 - [libc++][format][chrono] Addresses LWG3842.

[Mark de Wever via libcxx-commits]

Author: Mark de Wever
Date: 2023-04-07T17:53:37+02:00
New Revision: cf07b882e2c18279b1ab9f45e6fd4e1c06fe95ce

URL: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/cf07b882e2c18279b1ab9f45e6fd4e1c06fe95ce
DIFF: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/cf07b882e2c18279b1ab9f45e6fd4e1c06fe95ce.diff

LOG: [libc++][format][chrono] Addresses LWG3842.

  LWG3842 Unclear wording for precision in chrono-format-spec

Note there is nothing to do, the issue clarifies the wording in the Standard.
The new wording matches my interpretation of the previous wording and this has
already been implemented in libc++.

Reviewed By: #libc, ldionne

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D144328

Added: 
    

Modified: 
    libcxx/docs/Status/Cxx2bIssues.csv

Removed: 
    


################################################################################
diff  --git a/libcxx/docs/Status/Cxx2bIssues.csv b/libcxx/docs/Status/Cxx2bIssues.csv
index 2a8a4dcce9dbd..f9cd4a1914fe2 100644
--- a/libcxx/docs/Status/Cxx2bIssues.csv
+++ b/libcxx/docs/Status/Cxx2bIssues.csv
@@ -266,7 +266,7 @@
 "`3834 <https://wg21.link/LWG3834>`__","Missing ``constexpr`` for ``std::intmax_t`` math functions in ``<cinttypes>``","February 2023","","",""
 "`3839 <https://wg21.link/LWG3839>`__","``range_formatter``'s ``set_separator``, ``set_brackets``, and ``underlying`` functions should be ``noexcept``","February 2023","|Complete|","17.0","|format|"
 "`3841 <https://wg21.link/LWG3841>`__","``<version>`` should not be ""all freestanding""","February 2023","","",""
-"`3842 <https://wg21.link/LWG3842>`__","Unclear wording for ``precision`` in ``chrono-format-spec``","February 2023","","","|format|"
+"`3842 <https://wg21.link/LWG3842>`__","Unclear wording for ``precision`` in ``chrono-format-spec``","February 2023","|Complete|","16.0","|format|"
 "`3848 <https://wg21.link/LWG3848>`__","``adjacent_view``, ``adjacent_transform_view`` and ``slide_view`` missing ``base`` accessor","February 2023","","","|ranges|"
 "`3849 <https://wg21.link/LWG3849>`__","``cartesian_product_view::iterator``'s default constructor is overconstrained","February 2023","","","|ranges|"
 "`3850 <https://wg21.link/LWG3850>`__","``views::as_const`` on ``empty_view<T>`` should return ``empty_view<const T>``","February 2023","","","|ranges|"