[libcxx-commits] [PATCH] D103947: [libcxx] Fix using the vcruntime ABI with _HAS_EXCEPTIONS=0 defined
Paul Kirth via Phabricator via libcxx-commits
libcxx-commits at lists.llvm.org
Wed May 4 13:24:08 PDT 2022
paulkirth added a comment.
In D103947#3492009 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D103947#3492009>, @mstorsjo wrote:
> I think you should extend `test_macros.h` to define `TEST_HAS_EXCEPTIONS` like this:
>
> #if (!TEST_HAS_FEATURE(cxx_exceptions) && !defined(__cpp_exceptions) \
> && !defined(__EXCEPTIONS)) || \
> (defined(_HAS_EXCEPTIONS) && _HAS_EXCEPTIONS == 0)
> #define TEST_HAS_NO_EXCEPTIONS
> #endif
>
> As the `_HAS_EXCEPTIONS=0` flag practically means that we should skip exception tests, so the `no-exceptions` testsuite feature flag should be set. But on the compiler level, exceptions aren't really disabled, so this test macro doesn't pick it up, but we maybe can make the test macro look at `_HAS_EXCEPTIONS` too. Or does that break other tests, if `TEST_HAS_NO_EXCEPTIONS` suddenly is defined in all tests?
We already define the macro in that way. clang-format modified the layout slightly, but they look identical to me. I haven't noticed any tests failing because of that change.
Repository:
rG LLVM Github Monorepo
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D103947/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D103947
More information about the libcxx-commits
mailing list