[libcxx-commits] [PATCH] D130295: [libc++] Uses operator<=> in string_view

[Mark de Wever via Phabricator via libcxx-commits]

Mordante added inline comments.


================
Comment at: libcxx/test/support/test_comparisons.h:142-143
+    bool equal = order == Order::equivalent;
+    if constexpr (std::same_as<Order, std::strong_ordering>)
+        equal |= order == Order::equal;
+
----------------
mumbleskates wrote:
> For posterity, is there a strong reason this nuance was added? As I understand it, the standard mandates that `strong_ordering::equal == strong_ordering::equivalent` must hold true and the `equal` name only exists as a historical alias of the same value.
Yes since I missed that detail in the Standard ;-) I had a look and they are indeed the same, thanks for asking the question! I'll make a patch to simplify this.


Repository:
  rG LLVM Github Monorepo

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D130295/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D130295