[libcxx-commits] [PATCH] D122092: [libc++] `bitset::operator[] const` should return bool
Nikolas Klauser via Phabricator via libcxx-commits
libcxx-commits at lists.llvm.org
Fri Apr 1 22:24:47 PDT 2022
philnik added inline comments.
================
Comment at: libcxx/test/std/containers/sequences/vector.bool/const_reference.pass.cpp:16
+
+bool test() {
+ using CRefT = std::vector<bool>::const_reference;
----------------
var-const wrote:
> Optional nit: since this test isn't `constexpr`, it doesn't need to return anything -- unless you expect it to become `constexpr` at some future point?
This test should become `constexpr` once we implement P1004R2.
================
Comment at: libcxx/test/std/utilities/template.bitset/bitset.members/index_const.pass.cpp:46-55
+ std::bitset<1> set_;
+ set_[0] = false;
+ const auto& set = set_;
+ auto b = set[0];
+ set_[0] = true;
+#if !defined(_LIBCPP_VERSION) || defined(_LIBCPP_ABI_BITSET_CONST_SUBSCRIPT_RETURN_BOOL)
+ assert(!b);
----------------
var-const wrote:
> ldionne wrote:
> > Can you add the same test to the non-const `operator[]` (but you'll only have one `assert`)?
> >
> > Also, I'd recommend against using `#endif // comment` since this block is so short -- in this case it's even wrong.
> This comment doesn't seem to be addressed.
Thanks! I completely forgot to remove the comment.
Repository:
rG LLVM Github Monorepo
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D122092/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D122092
More information about the libcxx-commits
mailing list