[libcxx-commits] [PATCH] D111166: [libc++][doc] Update paper status.

[Louis Dionne via Phabricator via libcxx-commits]

ldionne requested changes to this revision.
ldionne added a comment.
This revision now requires changes to proceed.

We seem to be missing the LWG issues that were moved in the meeting. They are in http://wg21.link/p2450r0.



================
Comment at: libcxx/docs/Status/Cxx20Papers.csv:203
 "`P2367R0 <https://wg21.link/P2367R0>`__","LWG",Remove misuses of list-initialization from Clause 24,"June 2021","",""
+"`P2367R0 <https://wg21.link/P2367R0>`__","LWG",Remove misuses of list-initialization from Clause 24,"June 2021","",""
+"`P2372 <https://wg21.link/P2372>`__","LWG","Fixing locale handling in chrono formatters","October 2021","",""
----------------
This is a dupe with the previous line.


================
Comment at: libcxx/docs/Status/Cxx2bPapers.csv:34
+"`P2077 <https://wg21.link/P2077>`__","LWG","Heterogeneous erasure overloads for associative containers","October 2021","",""
+"`P2251 <https://wg21.link/P2251>`__","LWG","Require ``span`` & ``basic_string_view`` to be Trivially Copyable","October 2021","",""
+"`P2301 <https://wg21.link/P2301>`__","LWG","Add a ``pmr`` alias for ``std::stacktrace``","October 2021","",""
----------------
Mordante wrote:
> jloser wrote:
> > Feel free to put this as in progress if you'd like. I have a PR for it at https://reviews.llvm.org/D111197
> In general we don't use `In Progress` for the official paper status only for subprojects for aligning the work.
> But lets see which patch lands first and then make sure the second one sets the proper state for P2251.
Yeah let's just rebase @jloser 's patch on top of this one and mark the paper as complete.


Repository:
  rG LLVM Github Monorepo

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D111166/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D111166